Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Pluralism and media ownership - Coggle Diagram
Pluralism and media ownership
Core Idea: Society contains many competing groups and interests. The media reflects this diversity and audiances have real power because the media must give people what they want
Ownership and control
Many different owners, platforms and outlets exist giving a wide range of views
Audiances choose what to consume so owners must respond to demand ( Consumer Sover
Media Regulation ensures balance
Key thinkers and Ideas
Pluralist View: Media content reflects audiance demand rather than owner preferance
Users and Gratifications (McQuail): Audiances use media for infomation, entertainament and personal identity and social interaction
Journalistic Professionalsim: Journalists have professional values and independance which limits owner interferance
Market Model: If people dislike an outlet, they stop buying it and it fails
Evidence Supporting Pluralism
Wide choice of newspapers, TVchannels and websites across the political spectrum
Citizen journalism: ordinary people report events, with examples such as footage from protests and the Arab Spring
Interactivity: audiences can comment, share, challenge and shape stories. Prosumers both consume and produce.
Online platforms reduce the power of traditional gatekeepers.
Niche audiences are catered for, including minority groups.
Role of the audiance
Active, not passive. People select, interpret and sometimes reject messages.
Audiences can drive change, for example by boycotting or campaigning against an advertiser or programme.
Audiences can hold the media accountable, through online petitions and complaints.
Evaluation
Marxists argue that a few corporations still dominate the market despite the appearance of choice.
Tech giants control platforms and algorithms, and algorithms create filter bubbles.
Online content is often shaped by advertisers and profit.
The digital divide means not everyone can participate equally.
Ordinary content creators often have little reach compared with large corporations.
Regulation can be weak or slow, especially against global platforms.