Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Sætra, H. S. (2023, September). Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?…
-
Sætra asserts his claim that AI is undoubtedly the future of technology and how it is projected to become ingrained in every aspect of technology and therefore, society as a whole.
-
Evaluation: Both the first and second pieces of evidence point out two current example of AI demographics and how they use it. Students do not need AI to do their assignments when they are fully capable of doing it themselves. Professionals in business settings do not need AI to write their letters, emails, or reports when it is quite literally their job.
Evaluation: The first and second piece of evidence describe two realistic examples of AI's potential take over/ infiltration while determining how it will affect the companies as well as the workers.
Evaluation: The first piece of evidence offers a projected/ hypothetical outcome of AI on politics and democracy, what the professionals believe is a possibility or risk in the integrating of AI. The second piece of evidence addresses a pro-AI sentiment or positive opportunity but also points out the risks and dangers.
Evaluation: Evidence one highlights a relevant example of Googles usage of street images and literature for their sites. Evidence two explains the risks of generative AI models which are trained from and have full access to the internet.
Evaluation: Evidence one provides an example, Replika, of how AI is infiltrating humans social and emotional lives. Evidence two expands on how this can affect humans in the long run.