Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
WEEK 12 - Agentic AI & Org Transformation, AI DISCLOSURE PERCENTAGEβ¦
WEEK 12 - Agentic AI & Org Transformation
WEEK 12 - Enterprise AI Insights
1. Data Infrastructure
PAUL
Core Role
Organizes all business data
Uses Claude Code to automate routine data engineering tasks and infrastructure debugging
Key Takeaway
Safely and efficiently handing control of infra debugging and data pipelines to nonβtechnical staff
Main Use Cases
Kubernetes debugging using dashboard screenshots to resolve IP exhaustion
Translating plain text into fully automated data workflows for the finance team
Helping new hires navigate massive codebases and pipeline dependencies
Parallel task management and endβofβsession documentation updates
Team Impact
Resolved infrastructure problems without specialized network expertise
Accelerated onboarding for new data analysts
Enabled crossβteam selfβservice for finance teams with no coding experience
2. Product Development
SETS
end-to-end process of creating or improving a product. It combines business, engineering, design, and data to solve customer needs
Frameworks Used
Agile Development
Stage-Gate Model
Design Thinking
Lean Startup
Importance
Faster innovation
Lower failure rates
Better customer satisfaction
Competitive advantage
AI/Claude Code Use Cases
Rapid prototyping with autonomous iteration
Automated coding and testing
Bug fixing and feature implementation
Easier onboarding in complex codebases
Team Impact
Reduced manual coding work
Improved development speed
Better code quality through automation
4. Inference
team manages the memory system for AI models
Types of Inference
Batch Inference
Edge Inference
Real-time Iference
process where trained AI models use new data to make predictions or generate outputs.
structure
NVIDIA GPUs
AI accelerators
e.g Google TPUs
Cloud AI Services
Model serving platforms
Cloud vs Edge Inference
Cloud
Runs in data centers
Easier scaling
More powerful
Requires internet
Edge
Runs on local devices
Faster local responses
Better privacy
Can work offline
Main Use Cases
code base comprehension
fast file navigation during onboarding
explaining ML concepts
unit test generation
kubernetes management
cross-language translation
Claude code
bridges knowledge gaps
accelerates architecture
shortens learning curve for complex ML & memory systems
Team Impact
accelerated ML learning
research time reduced by 80%
Eliminated language barrier
allowing implementation in unfamiliar languages
SETS
3. Security Engineering
SETS
designing and maintaining secure systems that protect data, software, and infrastructure from cyber threats.
Core Principles
Confidentiality
Availability
Integrity
AI/Claude Code Use Cases
Vulnerability triaging
Architecture and code reviews
Infrastructure debugging
Security documentation and runbooks
Team Impact
Faster incident resolution
Reduced development bottlenecks
Shift from reactive to proactive defense
9. RL Engineering
TAMERA
Main Use Cases
Feature development with supervised autonomy for small to medium features.
Test generation and code review workflow after manual implementation.
Codebase comprehension and fast call stack analysis summarizing components.
Immediate Kubernetes operations guidance for configuration and deployment.
Domain Terminology
Checkpoint:
Saved state of progress or model weights for easy rollback.
RL:
Machine learning where models are trained to make decisions via rewards/punishments.
Supervised Autonomy:
AI working autonomously but with human oversight and correction ability.
Rollback:
Returning a system or codebase to a previous stable state upon errors.
Team Impact
Enabled an experimental "try and rollback" approach via frequent check-pointing.
Documentation acceleration through automatically generated helpful code comments.
Overview & Key Takeaway
Overview:
Focusing on efficient sampling and weight transfers, the RL team uses an iterative approach with frequent checkpointing to let AI autonomously build features.
Key Takeaway:
Adopting an experimental checkpoint-heavy workflow for supervised AI feature development.
Top Tips
Customize Claude.md to prevent repeated tool-calling mistakes (e.g., unnecessary path changes)
Use a checkpoint-heavy workflow to easily roll back experiments that don't work out
Try one-shot implementation first; if it fails, switch to a collaborative guided approach
8. Product Design
TAMERA
Overview & Key Takeaway
Overview:
The Product Design team supports Claude's interfaces.
Non-developer designers use Claude Code to bridge the gap with engineering, implementing their design vision directly.
Key Takeaway
: Bridging the traditional handoff gap, enabling direct code translation of design visions
Domain Terminology
Mockup:
Static visual design showing the final look of a software interface
State Manage:
Controlling UI data states under different user interactions
UI Polish:
Final fine-tuning of typography, spacing, and animations in UI
Design Handoff:
The process of designers passing finished visuals to engineers for coding
Main Use Cases
Direct front-end polish and large state management changes without engineering hand-offs.
Rapid interactive prototyping by pasting mockup images directly into Claude Code.
Complex copy changes and legal compliance implementation across the entire codebase.
Edge case discovery and system architecture mapping during the design phase.
Team Impact
Weeks to hours cycle time: complex updates completed in two 30-min sessions.
2-3x faster execution, with Claude Code becoming a primary design tool alongside Figma.
Two distinct user experiences: augmented workflow for devs, and new capabilities for designers.
Top Tips
Get proper setup help from engineers to overcome the initial technical onboarding barrier.
Use custom memory files to guide Claude to explain concepts simply and make incremental changes.
Leverage image pasting (Cmd+V) for rapid translation from static mockups to interactive prototypes.
10. Legal
TAMERA
Main Use Cases
Custom accessibility solution: built a predictive text speech app for family in just one hour
Legal workflow automation: built prototype phone trees to connect staff with the right lawyers
Team coordination tools automating G Suite updates and tracking legal review status
Rapid prototyping for solution validation to show domain experts for immediate feedback
Team Impact
Enabled prototype-driven innovation, sparking AI capability imagination across departments
Heightened security/compliance awareness and prioritized building compliance tools
Domain Terminology
Shadow IT:
IT systems built or used without explicit organizational IT approval.
Compliance:
Ensuring tech integrations align with legal and internal security standards.
Predictive Text:
Input technology that suggests words based on context.
Accessibility:
Designing products usable by everyone, including people with disabilities.
Top Tips
Plan extensively in Claude.ai first to generate a step-by-step prompt before coding
Work incrementally and visually: use screenshots to show expectations step-by-step
Share prototypes despite imperfection to spark innovation across typically siloed departments
Overview & Key Takeaway
Overview:
Automated workflows and built accessibility prototypes without traditional dev resources.
Key Takeaway:
Equipping legal with shadow IT capabilities to build accessibility and automation prototypes.
π 7. Growth Marketing (Claude Code)
JOSHUA
π―
Overview & Key Takeaway
π€
Overview:
As a non-technical team of one, Growth Marketing focuses on performance channels, using Claude Code to build agentic workflows that traditionally require significant engineering resources.
π
Key Takeaway:
Achieves 10x creative output and compresses hours of campaign setup into mere minutes.
π
Main Use Cases
π
Automated Pipelines:
Google Ads generation pipeline parsing CSVs to create targeted ad variations.
π¨
Custom Tools:
Figma plugin development for programmatic mass ad creative production.
π§
Self-Improving Tests:
Advanced prompt engineering with memory systems logging hypotheses.
π
Direct Analytics:
Meta Ads MCP server integration for direct campaign analytics without switching platforms.
π₯
Team Impact
β±οΈ
Dramatic Time Savings:
Ad copy creation reduced from 2 hours to just 15 minutes.
π
Unprecedented Scale:
10x increase in creative output, enabling experimentation at a massive scale.
π‘
Top Tips
π€
Target Automation:
Identify API-enabled repetitive tasks as prime candidates for automation.
π§©
Specialized Sub-Agents:
Break complex workflows into specialized sub-agents (e.g., headline vs. description).
π
Plan First:
Thoroughly brainstorm and prompt plan in Claude.ai before executing in Claude Code.
π
Domain Terminology
π
Agentic Flow:
Automated multi-step process driven autonomously by AI agents.
ποΈ
Figma Plugin:
Extensions for the Figma design software used for batch processing.
βοΈ
A/B Testing:
Comparing two versions of a webpage or ad to see which performs better.
ποΈ
Memory System:
Mechanism allowing AI to recall past experiments to optimize future output.
π 5. Data Science & Visualization (Claude Code)
π―
Overview & Key Takeaway
π οΈ
Overview:
Build production-quality analytics dashboards without needing full-stack developers.
π
Key Takeaway:
Empowers data scientists to bypass full-stack barriers autonomously.
π
Main Use Cases
ποΈ Build complex 5,000-line JS/TS React dashboards from scratch.
π Create persistent React dashboards (replacing throwaway Jupyter notebooks).
π§Ή Handle repetitive refactoring & complex merge conflicts.
πͺ Zero-dependency task delegation in completely unfamiliar codebases.
π₯
Team Impact
π
Workflow Shift:
Moved from throwaway notebooks to persistent React dashboards.
β±οΈ
Time Saved:
Achieved 2-4x time savings on routine tasks, accelerating evaluation cycles.
π‘
Top Tips for Supervision
π°
Slot Machine Approach:
Let it run; accept or restart fresh instead of wrestling with corrections.
π
Interrupt for Simplicity:
Actively guide the model toward simpler approaches.
π
Domain Terminology
π
TypeScript:
A strongly typed programming language building on JavaScript.
π
Jupyter:
Interactive computing environment blending code and rich text.
πͺ
Zero-dependency:
Delegating tasks directly to AI without prior project knowledge.
ποΈ
Refactoring:
Improving internal code structure without changing external behavior.
π 6. API (Claude Code)
π―
Overview & Key Takeaway
π
Key Takeaway:
Acts as the 'first stop' for unfamiliar code, granting engineers cross-domain debugging confidence.
π
Overview:
Serves as a guide for system architecture and navigation to bring external knowledge into Claude.
π
Main Use Cases
πΊοΈ
Workflow Planning:
First-step planning to identify exact files for bug fixes or new features.
βοΈ
Zero Copy-Pasting:
Eliminates context-switching overhead by asking directly in Claude Code.
π
Cross-Domain Debugging:
Independent debugging across completely unfamiliar parts of the codebase.
π§ͺ
Model Iteration:
Testing through dogfooding the latest research snapshots.
π₯
Team Impact
πͺ
Increased Confidence:
Faster rotation onboarding and confidence in tackling unfamiliar architecture.
π
Developer Happiness:
Enhanced productivity and massively reduced friction in daily workflows.
π‘
Top Tips for Supervision
π€
Iterative Partner:
Treat it as a collaborator for iteration, not a one-shot perfect solution generator.
π±
Minimal Start:
Start with minimal information and let Claude guide the discovery process.
π
Domain Terminology
π
Dogfooding:
Using one's own products or services to test and improve them.
π§
Context Switch:
The mental burden and time lost switching between different windows or tasks.
πΈ
Model Snapshot:
A specific version of an AI model saved at a given point in time.
π§
Codebase Nav:
Moving through and understanding the complex connections within large projects.
3. AI Evolution
Early AI
Recognition & Classification
:arrow_down:
Now AI
Phase 1
Gen AI
Creation & Dialogue
Cons: Lack of Proactive
Relies
Human-in-the-loop
Provide comprehensive
Phase 2
Agentic AI
Gen AI with planning & action
Goal-oriented
Virtual digital worker
Process Planning
Phase3
Physical AI
Physical Interaction
AI brain with
Multi-model perception
Logic reasoning
RPA software
Execute task in reality
TINA
1. Org Change & KSA
Paradigm Shift
Reactive Gen AI
:arrow_right:Disruptive shift
To survive
Define KSAs Models
Knowledge (K)
AI literacy
Algorithmic & cross-disciplinary logic
Data Privacy laws
Skill (S)
Workflow orchestration
API Integration
Hallucination auditing
Attitude (A)
Agile mindset
Collaborate approach
Humanβcentric ethics commitment
Proactive Agentic AI
Agentic AI
Understand macro business goal
Auto break down task
Call external AI
Self-corrects
virtual employee
Capability requires competency overhaul
TINA
2. Core Tech: ML & DL
Traditional Software engineering
Rule-based
If-else logic trees
:arrow_down:
Modern AI
Data-Driven
No hard-code rules
Core of ML(Machine Learmig)
Data & Stactistic find hidden patterns
Foundation of LLM
L
arge
L
anguage
M
odels
Transdormer architecture
by Google
Use 'Attention Mechmism'
Contextual sentence understanding
Deep Learing,DL
Use 'Artificial neural Networkers'
Good at processing complex data
Revolutionary Breakthroughts
Key Stage of Powerful AI
:one:Pre-training
Massive GPUs &Tokens
Build Foundation Cognition
:two:Fine-tuning
Pre-trained model is trained on high-quality
RLHF
R
einforcement
L
earning from
H
uman
F
eedback
Improve 'Alignment' & Guide AI behaviors
Make model safe, polite & non-offensive
RAG
R
etrival-
A
gumented
G
eneration
Search for accurate reference before answering
Ensure up-to-date info
Risk of hallucination
:arrow_down:
TINA
5. Industry & Costs
NOKS
AI by Industry Sector
Primary Industry: Agriculture & Farming
Uses
Drones + IoT senseors
Precision farming
Yield prediction
Automated irrigation
Goal
Digitize physical environments
Improve efficiency
Secondary Industry: Manufacturing & Construction
Uses
ERP integration
Supply Chain monitoring
Automated ordering
Vision AI defect detection
Benefits
Reduced downtime
Better Production quality
Tertiary Indudtry: Services, Finance, Retail
Uses
Customer service AI
Multilingual support
Financial compliance checking
Legal risk analysis
Benefits
Faster operations
Better customer experience
Improved compliance
AI Adoption by Company Size
Large Enterprise
Strategy
Private Cloud/on-premise AI
Custom open-source fine-tuning
Multi-agent systems
Features
AI Centers of Excellence (CoE)
High security
Deep technological advantage
Timeline & Cost: 6-12+ months
$300,000 to millions
SMEs (Small & Medium Enterprises)
Goal
Fast ROI
Operational Optimization
Strategy
Hybrid Cloud systems
Commercial APIs
RAG technology
ERP/CRM automation
Timeline & Cost
3-6 months
$15,000-$100,000
Micro/Solo Businesses
Strategy
No-code SaaS tools
Simple automation
Uses
Marketing automation
Administrative
Benefits
Low cost
Easy setup
Agile operations
Timeline
1-4 weeks
Key Terms
RAG
Retrieval-Augmented Generation -> AI reads company databases/documents
Saas
Software as a Service -> Cloud-based AI tools
No-Code: Build AI workflows without Programming
ROI: Return on Investment -> Profit gained AI Investment
CoE: Center of Excellence -> Team managing enterprise AI strategy
7. Dynamic Risk Lab
PAUL
Agentic AI Context
Agent autonomy vs. governance guardrails
Innovation velocity vs. systemic risk tension
Realβworld stakes: financial loss, PR disasters, data leaks
Key Axes in the Lab
Autonomy (Speed)
Low β human-in-the-loop, slow decisions
High β fully autonomous agents, rapid execution
Governance (Safety)
Low β weak supervision, few controls
High β strong compliance, strict approval flows
Zones on the Map
Danger Zone
High autonomy + low governance
Extreme risk of failure, high systemic risk score
Stagnation Zone
Low autonomy + very high governance
Safe but inefficient; underused AI potential
Optimal Zone
Balanced autonomy and guardrails
High innovation, managed risk
Risk Factors & Failure Modes
Prompt injection & malicious inputs
Hallucinations and wrong autonomous actions
Large money transfers, data exfiltration, API misuse
Governance & Control Mechanisms
Semantic routers / filters for prompts
Rate limiting, access control, API governance
Human-in-the-loop escalation for highβrisk actions
4. Global Trends
Shift in the AI Industry
From: Competing on large model size
To: Building Agentic Ecosystems
Reducing Inference Costs
Making AI commercially scalable
Force 1: AI Infrastructure Giants: Main Players: Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta
What they control?
AGI research
Cloud Computing infrastructure
APIs and computing power
Platforms
Azure 2. AWS 3. GCP
Goal
Lower API/inference costs
Enable Large Scale AI agents
Impact
AI becomes cheaper
Businesses can automate more tasks
NOKS
Force 2: Open-Source & Startups
Key Models
-Llama Series -Mistral
Important Concepts
Edege AI - AI runs locally on devices
Small Language Models(SLMs)
Smaller, targeted AI models
Can run offline
Advantages
Lower latency
Lower cloud costs
Better privacy
Rise of Vertical AI - AI specialized for one industry
Industries: - Healthcare - Law - Finance
Uses: - Medical imaging -Compliance auditing - Trading risk monitoring
Why It Matters: Specialized AI often performs better than general AI in specific tasks
Future Competitive Advantage
Main Idea: Data + Specialized AI + Low Cost = Competitive Advantage
6. MIT Benchmark
NOKS
Faculty & Credibility
Dr Abel Sanchez & Prof. John R. Williams
Real-world experiences with Microsoft, Ford and the US DoD
Curriculumn Structure (8 Modules)
Modules 1-4: cover the technical foundation (multi-agent systems, APIs, cyber risks)
Modules 5-8: focuses on deployment strategy (Change Management, Crawl-Walk-Run)
Governance & Alumni Network
GDPR/HIPPA compliance, balancing innovation with guardrails and 155-country alumni network
AI DISCLOSURE PERCENTAGE RATE (%)
GROUP 1
TAMERA
SETS
NOKS
0%
15%
0%
JOSHUA
PAUL
TINA
0%
10%
0%
JOSHUA
JOSHUA
Benefits: -break tech monopolies -allow private/on-premise AI -improve data confidentiality