I don't remember what I got on this test but I was a high scorer in openness and a low score in conscientiousness, agreeableness, and neuroticism. I'd say I scored high in openness because I'm naturally drawn to new ideas, I get curious easily, and I'd rather explore something new than stick to what's familiar. I didn't score very high in conscientiousness. Structure and routines feel limiting to me and my follow through can be inconsistent even when I genuinely care about something. I'm consistent in waking up everyday at 7 but I can't bring myself to be early for classes because I get distracted by literally anything. I'm also pretty low in agreeableness, not in a mean way, but I enjoy an argument or a little bit of rage bait. Low neuroticism is probably the one I'm most grateful for because I don't spiral easily and stress doesn't stick to me the way I see it affect other people. Putting that all together the profile basically describes someone who does better with creative freedom than in a structured environment where you're expected to follow rules and make everyone happy. It made me think more seriously about what kind of work and environment I'd actually thrive in rather than just survive in. Like I've worked multiple jobs one of them was like a typical office job where we had to just follow rules and do what we are told, and the other an outdoors research project where we had freedom to form a project and just got to explore. I'd much rather the outdoor research project. I was much happier and livelier than when I was sitting in a chair doing spreadsheets and google docs.