Imposing Gender
When you look for gender, you will find gender. A tension exists between using gender as a category of analysis, and imposing an understanding of gender on societies that view gender in a different, maybe even conflicting way: “Western ideas are imposed when non-Western social categories are assimilated into the gender framework that emerged from a specific sociohistorical and philosophical tradition,” (Oyěwùmí 452). The social construction of gender is dependent on a biological deterministic understanding of bodies, one that assumes there are two sexes and two genders. Furthermore, if this conceptual understanding becomes linked to the idea that gender is socially constructed everywhere, then it naturalizes the social construct of gender as universal rather than trying to understand societies by and on their own terms.
This tension can be found in the example of West Africa: "In precolonial Yorúba society, body-type was not the basis for social hierarchy: males and females were not ranked according to anatomic distinction,” (Oyěwùmí 449). Rather, “The ranking of individuals depended first and foremost on seniority, which was usually defined by relative age,” (Oyěwùmí 449). In this case, gender did not become a reality until researchers imposed gender as a category of analysis. If development theoriests, researchers, and policymakers assume patriarchy, gender, and social organization looks the same everywhere, then the analysis will be skewed to represent the researcher's assumed point of intervention. Rather than looking if something exists, it is more analytically productive to learn from societies by and with their own terms.
Oyěwùmí, Oyèrónkẹ́. 2013. “The Invention of Women.” In Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology, 448–54. John Wiley & Sons.
-