Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
The Hidden Blueprint Behind Social Order (How modern life shapes and also…
The Hidden Blueprint Behind Social Order (How modern life shapes and also justifies various human behaviors)
Creation of a "Norm" --> (how societies create categories) :star: 
Fanon: Colonial racism turns whiteness into the standard of normal humanity and makes Blackness appear as deviation. Fanon shows this when he writes, “My blackness was there, dark and unarguable.”:silhouette:
-
Foucault: Modern institutions define normality through observation, ranking, correction, and examination. The “normal” person is produced by comparison.:silhouette:
Butler: Gender norms create the illusion that male/female and masculine/feminine are natural categories. Butler’s project is to “open up the field of possibility for gender.”:silhouette:
Brown: Neoliberalism changes the boundaries of social life by weakening “society” and replacing democratic responsibility with market logic, family morality, and private responsibility. Brown describes neoliberalism as market principles becoming governing principles across institutions and subjects.:silhouette:
Douglas: Purity rules create social order by deciding what belongs and what does not. Dirt is not naturally dirty; it becomes dirty when it crosses a boundary. Douglas’s key idea is that dirt is “matter out of place.” :silhouette:
-
-
Graeber: Capitalism creates strange categories of value: some jobs that help people are underpaid, while many meaningless jobs are treated as prestigious. Graeber calls these “bullshit jobs.”:silhouette:
-
Freud: Civilization creates “normal” behavior by forcing people to restrain instinct, aggression, and desire. What looks like social order is built on repression and guilt.:silhouette:
Connection: Society creates categories of what counts as normal, and people eventually start to act these categories out as if its their actual identity.
Difference: "Creation of a Norm" is more focused on classifying certain categories, whereas "Masks" is focused on the behavior of people that act out these pre-imposed categories in their daily lives.
-
Masks, Scripts, and Performances (How identity is acted out or enforced --> roleplaying positions society has already written) :star:
Freud: Civilization gives people roles they must perform: moral citizen, restrained subject, obedient family member. The superego becomes like an inner audience judging the performance.:silhouette:
Douglas: Rituals are social scripts. Purity practices do not just reflect order; they help create it by teaching people what actions, bodies, and objects belong where.:silhouette:
Fanon: The “white mask” is a forced performance. The colonized subject is pressured to speak, act, and appear according to white standards in order to be recognized.:silhouette:
Foucault: Institutions script behavior through routines: school schedules, military drills, prison rules, workplace procedures. People become trained through repeated action.:silhouette:
Butler: Gender is not a stable inner truth but a repeated social performance. Butler’s theory fits this branch especially well because she argues that gender becomes real through repeated acts.:silhouette:
-
-
-
Brown: Neoliberal politics performs “freedom” while often strengthening hierarchy, traditional morality, and antidemocratic power. Public politics becomes staged as private liberty.:silhouette:
Graeber: Bullshit jobs require people to perform usefulness even when they secretly believe their work does not need to exist. The worker has to act busy, productive, and necessary.:silhouette:
-
-
Power and Control Through the Body :star:
Graeber: Modern work often drains bodies and time without producing meaningful social value. Graeber begins from Keynes’s prediction of a 15-hour workweek and asks why technology instead helped keep people working more.:silhouette:
-
Brown: Neoliberalism turns the person into human capital. The body becomes responsible for maximizing itself: working, competing, improving, and privately managing risk.:silhouette:
Butler: Bodies are not just biological facts; they are interpreted through gender norms. Butler connects bodily acts to the production of gender identity.:silhouette:
Foucault: Discipline creates “docile bodies”: bodies that are trained, timed, corrected, and made useful. His account of punishment also shows power moving from spectacular violence to everyday control.:silhouette:
-
-
Freud: Civilization manages the body by limiting instinct and desire. The body wants satisfaction, but civilized life demands restraint.:silhouette:
Douglas: Purity rules protect the symbolic body of society. Boundaries around the physical body often represent boundaries around the social order.:silhouette:
-
Fanon: The Black body is made hyper-visible under the white gaze. Fanon shows how racism turns the body into a social sign before the person can define himself.:silhouette:
Fanon: “My blackness was there, dark and unarguable.”
False Freedoms :star:
Freud: Civilization protects people, but it also makes full happiness impossible. Freedom from danger comes at the cost of instinctual freedom. :silhouette:
-
-
Douglas: Purity systems promise safety and order, but they also create fear of contamination and punish what does not fit.:silhouette:
Fanon: Colonial society may claim universal humanity, but Black subjects are denied full freedom because recognition is filtered through race.:silhouette:
Foucault: Modern power often looks less violent than public torture, but it becomes more constant and internal. Foucault writes that public execution was also “a political ritual.”:silhouette:
Butler: Liberation cannot simply mean escaping all norms. Butler suggests subversion happens from inside the law and through unexpected uses of its own terms.:silhouette:
-
Brown: Neoliberalism speaks in the language of freedom while hollowing out democratic life and expanding market rule into more areas of existence.:silhouette:
-
-
Graeber: Modern workers are told they are free, yet many remain trapped in jobs they privately believe should not exist. Graeber argues that useless work creates anger and resentment.:silhouette:
-
Connection:
What a society calls “freedom” often still depends on hidden boundaries. People are told they are free, but only if they stay within accepted norms.
Difference: "Creation of a Norm" asks: Who or what counts as acceptable?
"False Freedoms" asks: How does control disguise itself as choice or freedom?
Both highlight or briefly mention the idea that catefories are not natural, but instead produced by institutions and other factors socially.:silhouettes:
-
Neoliberal capitalism redefines value, making market usefulness seem more important than human usefulness. Both authors talk about their opinion on capitalism, and the broader effects they have on society. "Bullshit jobs" vs "Market-principles" dominating the social space:silhouettes:
After learning about Freud’s internalized norms, it helps explain why gender roles feel emotionally binding, and how civilization often dictates how we must act :silhouettes:
Both Fanon and Butler show that identity is not something people simply choose or express freely. Instead, identity is shaped by social pressure and expectations. Fanon shows that colonial racism pressures Black people to see themselves through the standards of the white world. On the other hand, Butler shows that gender is shaped by repeated social norms, so people often “perform” gender in ways society expects from them.:silhouettes:
Both Foucault and Graeber show that institutions often care less about whether work is meaningful and more about whether people appear productive. For Foucault, institutions train people to follow schedules, routines, and rules. For Graeber, many modern jobs require workers to act useful even when the job itself feels pointless.:silhouettes:
Both Douglas and Butler show that societies use ideas about the body to create a sense of order. Douglas explains that rules about purity and pollution are really rules about what belongs and what does not belong. Butler shows that gender norms organize bodies into categories like male/female roles. In both cases, the body becomes a way for society to enforce its rules on people.:silhouettes:
Both Brown and Graeber criticize a society that values people mainly by their economic usefulness (under capitalism). Brown shows how neoliberalism turns people into “human capital,” meaning they are expected to constantly compete and improve themselves. Graeber shows how modern work culture makes people spend their lives in jobs that may look productive on paper but often feel meaningless in reality. In both cases, human worth gets reduced to how productive they are to the market.:silhouettes:
Both Freud and Foucault show that society maintains order by controlling people’s bodies and desires. Freud focuses on how civilization requires people to restrain bodily instincts, like anger or happiness/pleasure. Foucault focuses on how institutions train bodies through schedules and constant surveillance. Most importantly however is that both authors believe social order depends on making bodies more controlled and obedient.:silhouettes:
Both Freud and Brown show that what society calls “freedom” can still control people. Freud argues that civilization gives people safety and order, but only by making them limit their desires and accept guilt. Brown argues that neoliberalism talks a lot about individual freedom, but that freedom often means people are responsible for solving problems on their own. In both cases, freedom is never a straight-forward or guaranteed thing. It comes with downsides such as control.:silhouettes:
Both of these authors expose how a market-dominated society can claim that its citizens are "free" while trapping them in meaningless lives that are never truly free. When stuck in doing nothing that genuinely provides value or meaning, freedom might as well not be called freedom.:silhouettes:
Both authors illustrate in their writings that freedom requires challenging imposed identities, which may as well take away the benefits of freedom itself. They bring up an interesting point as one of the key factors of freedom is being able to express yourself. Without that, is it truly freedom?:silhouettes: