Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Militia Engagement - Coggle Diagram
Militia Engagement
Actor Profile
Command Structure
Territorial Footprint
Community Relationship
Funding Sources
External Patrons
Ideology and Political Goals
History of Fragmentation
Current State Relationships
Legal and Human Rights
Allegations of War Crimes
Child Recruitment
Trafficking or Predatory Finance
Abuse of Civilians
Sectarian Targeting
Obstruction of Aid
Links to Banned Entities
Incentive Map
Survival and Security Concerns
Access to Resources
Desire for Local Recognition
Fear of Rivals
Ideological Alignment or Hostility
Economic Dependency on Conflict
Expectations of Future Amnesty
Purpose
Civilian Protection
Humanitarian Access
Deconfliction
Ceasefire Support
DDR/SSR Pathway
Local Stabilization
Reliability and Control
Level of Discipline Over Members
History of Keeping Agreements
Risk of Defection
Susceptibility to Infiltration
Command and Control Resiliance
Likelihood of Freelance Violence
Second Order Effects
Empowerment of Future Fighters
Damage to Institutions
Dependency on Foreign Input
Weakened State Legitimacy
Incentives for Other Groups to Mobilize for Attention
Regional Spillover
Engagement Options
No Contact
Humanitarian Deconfliction Only
Indirect Contact via Intemediaries
Community Level Dialogue w/o SCB/SFA
Time Limited Specific Support
Decision Matrix
Legal Risk
Civilian Harm Risk
Legitimacy Risk
Reliability Risk
Strategic Distortion Risk
Legitimacy
Community Support vs Coercive Control
Relationships with elders, leaders, women etc
Rival Claimants
Local Dispute Record
Decision Categories
Avoid
Deconflict Only
Monitor and Reasses
Restrict Engagement Under Safeguards
Community Impact Analysis
Engagement?
Would it shift local power balance?
Would it intensify local tensions/conflict?
Would civilians view it as legitimizing abuse?
Would it undermine local gov/police?
Would it expose civilians to abuse?