Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
SMMC_G5_ENT‐2 Introduction to Entrepreneurship, G5 (IBS4 Elaine, IBS3…
SMMC_G5_ENT‐2
Introduction to Entrepreneurship
{1}What is entrepreneurship?
Entrepreneur profile
Common myths
myth2: Gender and Race
Entrepreneurs are all white men :red_cross:
In the United States, about 38% of businesses are founded by women, and 36% are founded by minorities
According to the research, there was no significant difference in entrepreneurial outcomes among companies after obtaining funding and resources
myth3: Personality
Entrepreneurs have certain personality, such as overconfidence :red_cross:
Overconfidence influences whether people start a business, but not whether they succeed
"Passion" and having a "locus of control" personality are associated with entrepreneurial success
myth 1: Age
Young entrepreneurs without family burdens are most likely to succeed :red_cross:
Most successful entrepreneurs reach their peak between the ages of 45 and 52
There is no standard type of entrepreneur, and entrepreneurial success does not necessarily require a specific background
Stereotype
Young, college dropouts, white men, and technical geniuses
These may influence investors' judgments and find these types of young entrepreneurs
e.g. Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs
Success rate and risk
Basic survival rate from SBA
first-year failure rate: 21.5%
Ten-year survival rate: 33.5%
The truth about return on investment
Of the 499 ventures, more than 350 had a "zero" return
The average return is about 2.2 times
Most companies fail, only a few offer extremely high returns (hundreds of times)
Success rate depends on who you are and the opportunity you pursue
e.g. Invent new devices to address unmet medical needs: 5%-10%
e.g. A proven successful franchise business: 80%-90%
Definition
Creating and managing a new business to achieve some objectives
Different motives
Goal-oriented entrepreneurship
e.g. Laura Overdeck founded "Bedtime Math"
(education improvement)
e.g. Nate Hodge founded "Raaka Chocolate"
(personal passion)
e.g. Carl Dietrich founded "Terrafugia" (vision: bring flying cars to consumers)
To make a living
e.g. roadside vendors(small scale)
Main goal
:star:Achieve financial sustainability to realize ideals and avoid bankruptcy
Long-term positive cash flow
SaaS (Service as a Software) model
LTV>CAC
LTV: lifetime value
Service fees, usage time, and retention rate
CAC: customer acquisition cost
Selling and marketing expense
Improve retention rate (reduce churn rate) or reduce customer acquisition cost
Physical product model
Q(p−c)>f
p: price
c: cost
f: fixed costs
Q: quantity
increase quantity, increase gross profit or control fixed costs
{2}Corporate Entrepreneurship
Ambidextrous Org
Exploitation
Existing technological trajectory
Making incremental improvements for the existing customer base
Primary revenue stream:star:
Exploration
Discontinuous technology
Entirely new geographic or niche markets
Sustaining through long-term technological shifts
Internal Development
Dedicated exploration time
Google:20% time
Independent R&D labs
Tech giants like Microsoft, Intel, or Alphabet’s X focus on disruptive "Moonshot" technologies
Talent development
LinkedIn offers "sabbaticals" to allow employees to pursue new ideas
Types of Innovation
Sustaining Innovation
Established companies continuously improve product performance to meet the demands of high-end customers
Disruptive Innovation
Entering the market from the low end, these innovations initially underperform but improve rapidly, eventually displacing the established leaders
External Strategies
Strategic Partnerships
Sharing technology or market access with other companies
Partnerships between Tesla and Toyota, or with Airbnb
CVC
A dedicated subsidiary makes equity investments in startups, serving as a bridge to acquire future technologies
Acquisitions
Acquiring startups to gain talent and technology or to eliminate potential competitors
Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram
{3}Social role of entrepreneurs
investor value
high return
Average return on investment: 2.2 times
high-tech lead
generates 86% of the total value
high risk
Most frequent outcome return of 0%.
Platform for technological advancement
Breaking the inertia of large enterprises
for example
Employees of Fairchild Semiconductors left due to the inertia of large corporations and founded Intel
create job opportunities
private sector anchor
Small businesses startups create 67% of private sector jobs in the US.
High-tech startups company
High-tech startups account for 37% of job creation
unicorn
definition
Valuation>US1billion
Less than 0.2% of companies can be unicorns
business model
consumer orientation (B2C)
for example
Uber or Blue Apron
Valuation truth
65% of these valuations on paper
Cash-out conditions = Exit mechanism
IPO
Acquired by a large corporation
{6}Impact / Social Entrepreneurship
Definition & Core Concepts
Ethical, transparent enterprises with meaningful life impact
For-profit: Focus on profits + long-term financial sustainability
Market-driven social impact (not donor-dependent)
Synonymous with social entrepreneurship
Triple bottom line
1st: Profits (traditional accounting)
2nd: Social impact
3rd: Environmental impact
Goal: Balance profit + social/environmental value
Typical Areas
Education
Energy
:<3:Healthcare
Sanitation
Examples
Grameen Bank: Microloans, 8M borrowers, >95% repayment
GrameenPhone: Connectivity for poor, 50M+ subscribers
Teamlease: Skills training + jobs, 1M+ Indians employed
Tesla: EVs + open patents (environmental mission)
Similarities to Traditional Entrepreneurship
Product-market fit
Hire talent on limited budget
Financial management & growth strategy
Same operational logic as regular startups
Unique Challenge
1.Scaling
Tackles hardest problems (remote/poor)
hard to scale
Social goals add real costs (underserved populations)
Strategies
Franchising/licensing to expand geographically
Partner with last-mile orgs (Red Cross, YMCA)
Policy advocacy (e.g., Teamlease labor law reform)
2.Financing & Patient Capital
Traditional VC: 5-7yr exits don't match slow social growth
Need patient capital sources
Foundations (Gates, Ford)
Government grants
Impact funds (Omidyar, Khosla Impact, Acumen)
Traditional VC possible if: large market + fast scaling
Align business maturity timeline with investor expectations
Traditional Companies Adopting Social Missions
Mission impact
Consumer priority: Design > Price > Quality > Mission
Brand personality + recruitment/retention tool
Design principles
Lead with product, mission second
Mission must be authentic/believable
Simple implementation("buy one, give one")
e.g. Warby Parker: Buy-one-give-one glasses (>1M donated)
e.g. TOMS: Buy-one-give-one shoes
{4}Types of Enterprises
High growth companies
Silicon Valley style startup
Goal : grow very quickly to scale up
be the next Google, Uber, Facebook, or be bought by them
Venture capital or Angel funding
Exit : IPO or Acquisition
Small percentage of startups
Around 2% receive venture capital
Lifestyle startups
Run as hobbies or supplemental sources of income
Enjoy what they're doing
The funding is fairly minimal
in home
outside of work
outside of school
No scaling planned
No exit planned
Small businesses
The most common business type
Goal : feed the family
Be your own boss
Long-term stable operation
Funded by loans, personal, family or friends
Don't want to grow
:<3: Open one dry cleaner
:red_cross: Open seven dry cleaners
Intrapreneurship ventures
Startup inside larger organization
Goal : develop something new or innovative
Resources : internal company resources
:silhouette: Personal risk is relatively low
Adapted into larger firm or spun-off
Scaling : depending on the situation
Social ventures
Goal : accomplish some social mission
charity
political
lobbying
artistic
cultural
Create value for society
Resources : grants, volunteers, donations
No exit planned
Building something sustainable for the long-term
{5} Technology Entrepreneurship
Technology & Entrepreneurship
Technological Change as Opportunity Source :!:
Upset Market Equilibrium
Examples
Genentech—Biotechnology
Google & Facebook—Internet
Technological Change≠ Success :red_cross:
Beyond Tech: Success Drivers
Integration of Business Model Choices
Effective Resource Mobilization
Sound Entry & Scaling
Geographic Clustering
The Phenomenon
Geographic clustering of technology
Venture Capital Flow Statistics
(1/3 of US VC to Silicon Valley & Boston)
Drivers of Clustering
Labor & Capital Markets
Access to specialized talent and funding
Knowledge Spillovers
Informal information exchange in social settings
Pre-existing locations of
Star Scientists
Critical for early Biotech
Second-Order Effects
Angel Investor Networks
recycling wealth and expertise
Formation of Entrepreneurial Mafias
Example
PayPal Mafia—Thiel, Musk, Hoffman
Technology Adoption S-Curve
The Dynamics between Technological Progress and Market Adoption
Profit Allocation Framework
Who appropriates the profits?
Stakeholders/Allocators of Value
• IInventorm • itator/Follower
• Customers • Suppliers
Fundamental Determinants
Bargaining Power/ Market Power
The Two Key Drivers (Pillars)
Appropriability
IP, Trade Secrets, Speed
Can the knowledge be controlled/protected?
Complementary Assets
Mfg, Sales Channels, Brand
Control over essential assets needed to exploit the knowledge.
Stage of industry evolution & Dominant Design
Maturity
Takeoff
Ferment
1
1
G5
IBS4 Elaine
30%
IBS3 Sharon
50%
IPCM4 Tiffany
30%
IBSm1 Allen
10%
IBSm1 Jessica
25%
IBS4 Ryan
20%
:pencil2: Dimensions of difference
Different goals and Motivations
Resources needed
Where you can do them
Time used
Time / Effort
Performance Metric
Saturation
High
3
2
1
Low
Steve Blank
:red_flag:Founding Team
Technical Depth + Business Breadth
➊ Ferment
➋ Takeoff
➌ Maturity
:star:Key Challenges
Crossing the Chasm
Strategies for Overcoming Established vs. Establishing New (De novo) Platforms
2
🎯 3
Complementary Assets
Uniqueness
2
🎯 3
Significance Trend
p-c: gross profit