Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Trauma and memory in the recent Ukrainian poetry of the 21th century: the…

- - - - this method relies on the heritage of the existential philosoply. It could be a good way to explain how the question of "being", 'presence", "care", "rooting-in and rooting-out" into being or of the national being works within the situation of the war
    - - This method is good for explanation how the mythologic patterns appear in the poetry. Especially, if we talk about the concept of liminality (= of the metapsysic topoi of "this" world and "that" world (= the world of the afterlife))
    - - This method could help us to research how the patterns of trauma (= traumatic experience) work on the level of individual consciousness and on the level of the collective institutions. Is it something that still be in the silence/oblivion (in our life stories/history) ? Or is it illuminated yet? The frame of postmemory could be helpful for the investigation how old patterns reactualize on our presence (and how the poetry retraces this reactualization)
    - - These methods could be useful at the explanation of the synergy of the literature as a kind of art and the historical background of the nation historical existence. We think about our life and about our historical events via the familiar types of the situations in the past, so these methods might let us establish the "common threads" with some events and some reprresentations of these events via the set of the images, themes, motifs, intentions etc.
    - - This method could let us determine the authorsattitude toward the reality, toward the war via the optics of their vision, values, feelings, experience etc. The psychobiographical method could let us to retrace the map of the authors "inner feeling of the borderline situation"
    - - These methods could heelp us to elucidate the psychological basis of the trauma, traumatic memory, and liminality as a being between the consciousness and unconsciousness. The theory ofn archetypes could be the good method to establish the connection with the mythopoetical method.
    - - This method could be quite valuable to establish the typology, the common patterns with the pieces of literature that belong to the other cultural spaces (or at least to the different dots in time but withim the same literary tradition). This method could be united with the mythopoetical, typological, and the theory of archetypes (but with the others too)
    - - This method could be very important if we are going to explain the lines of the "hermeneutical circle" of the certain poem (= the context that is restricted by the circumstances of the "artistic reality"= depicted world in a poem)
    - - This method is needed when we try to explain the role of the national images ("self', 'stranger', 'other'). The hostile images (or the images of the enemy) always will be depicted in the collective consciousness (and at the collective memory) as a 'stranger', 'alien'. At the same time,the images of 'self' and 'other' can be painted with different meanings (good or bad sometimes also)
    - - This method could be appropriate, when we consider the dynamics of the appearing of the theme of the war (anxiousness, fear, identity, existence etc.) at the pieces of art (not only within the pieces of literature)
    - - This method is needed for the investigation of the dynamics how the gender role could be changed within the situation of the war. For example, now in the Ukrainian armed forces are a lot of women, and the huge number of them are the women who are the artists (not only writers). At the same time we can retrace the line of changes how men shift their vision of the "traditional male/female roles"
    - - (literary studies + philosophy, psychology, history, sociology, cultural studies etc.)