These two pieces of evidence, when read together, show how Melville undermines the effectiveness of language to communicate. With Bartleby not visible to the lawyer, the lawyer's "voice" is meant to connect the two. This implies that the lawyer assumes that speech will be an effective way of communicating with Bartleby. Clearly, this isn't the case -- although both characters can produce language, unlike the characters in Faulkner's story, the lawyer is never able to fully understand Bartleby through language. When the lawyer tries to understand why Bartleby says he prefers not to work, Bartleby simply repeats the phrase, "I would prefer not to." This inability to understand one another with language is reflected by the tall folding-screen that physically separates both characters. While voice is meant to bridge this divide, it fails, and both characters are isolated in their own physical and mental spaces.