Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
History and Systems - Coggle Diagram
History and Systems
Behaviourism
Major Influences
Animal Studies: Puzzle-box Studies > Edward L. Thorndike (1874-1949)
- Trial and error learning explained in terms of stimulus-response connections
- The law of effect (successful actions reinforced and unsuccessful lost)
- Thorndike extended this set of ideas to the human mind
Animal Studies: Classical Conditioning in Dogs > Ivan Petrovitch Pavlov (1849–1936)
- Discovered classical conditioning: reflexes that can become conditional or dependent on the formation of an association between unconditioned and conditioned stimuli and stimuli and response (“psychical secretions”, later replaced by “conditioned responses”)
- Pavlov helped shift associationism from its emphasis on subjective ideas to objective and quantifiable physiological events (for example, glandular secretions); He proposed to substitute physiology for psychology, eliminating the talk about the mind for talk about the brain
- Provided behaviourism with a method for studying behaviour and for attempting to control and modify it
J.B. Watson: Behaviourist Manifesto
- The study of the content of consciousness (introspection) must be abandoned in favour of the study of observable behaviour
- Psychology must discard all reference to consciousness in explaining behaviour
- The sources of behaviour are external (in the environment), not internal (in the mind, in the head)
- Psychology was to make no sharp distinction between human and animal behavior; and its goal was to develop principles by which all behaviour could be predicted and controlled
Forms of Behaviorism: Methodological Behaviorism
- Behaviourism is a way of doing science > Methodological behaviourists claim that consciousness/mind exists but it cannot be studied scientifically
- Mind was to be explained by postulating variables which intervened between environmental events and behaviour
- These intervening variables were to be specified operationally - in publicly observable terms
Forms of Behaviorism: Radical Behaviorism
- B.F. Skinner (1904-1990)
- Intervening variables are pointless stories
- Mind does not exist
- The task of psychology is to identify the variables that control behaviour
- Operant conditioning
Cognitive Revolution
Behaviourism: Problems Within
- While it was believed that the principles emerging from experimentally (artificially) controlled experiments would illuminate the way ALL organisms learned (regardless of their evolutionary heritage), evidence accumulated in the 1960s was starting to erode this assumption of generality:
- The laws of learning uncovered with rats and pigeons were not general
- The serious evolutionary constraints dictate what and how animal learns
- Ethologists demonstrated the importance of considering innate factors in explaining an animal’s behaviour in the natural environment its ancestors evolved.
- Skinner’s radical behaviourism continued the tradition, established by Watson, of rejecting all inner causes of behaviour and insisting that organisms were “empty” and controlled solely by external stimuli.
- However, increasing number of phenomena were starting to be acknowledged as inconsistent with the conception of “black box S-R psychology:
- for example, a pianist playing an arpeggio is performing each act too quickly for any given act to be determined by the immediately preceding one
- Speech: sentence structure and production must be planned in advance
- It was becoming obvious that people possess higher-level symbolic processes enabling them to represent the world internally, and that human responses were controlled by these internal representations, instead of being directly controlled by external stimulation.
- Fewer and fewer behaviourists believed that it was illegitimate to postulate mechanisms taking place within the organism and linking together stimuli and responses.
Rediscovering mind: Chomsky and ”the cognitive revolution”
- Avram Noam Chomsky (born December 7, 1928, 91 years old)
- One of the most prominent intellectuals of the late 20th century
- Outspoken linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist.
- Referred to as "the father of modern linguistics”, also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science.
- In 1959, Chomsky published a critique of Skinner’s account of language (Verbal Behaviour, Skinner, 1957)
- Chomsky’s critique did for the cognitive revolution what Watson’s manifesto did for behaviourism
- Chomsky argued that Skinner’s explanations in terms of contingencies between S and R may be possible in artificial, controlled environments, but in realistic settings, they are totally useless and meaningless
- The behaviour can’t be predicted from the stimuli defined in physical terms, because they are few physical properties that affect behavior in systematic way; – If you identify the important aspect of the stimulus from the behaviour, it is circular
Chomsky on Language
- No behaviourist approach to language can cope with its endless creativity and flexibility
- The only way to understand language is to acknowledge that it is a rule-governed system
- Knowledge of language is internally represented as a generative grammar and this ability is innate
- Language is a human species-specific trait (language acquisition device) and although other species can learn crudely to communicate their desires through signs, they are unable to acquire anything remotely like human language
Contributions from Computer Science
- After the WWII, the development of high-speed digital computers and associated concepts grounded in information theory.
- The Computer Metaphor: Humans viewed as general purpose computing devices and their inputs and outputs were to be explained in terms of theories (programs) about representations and computations on these internal representations.
- Can the mind be described by analogy to a computer?
- Mind, body, program, computer
- Can we create a mind in a computer?
Alan Turing (1912-1956)
- Whether computers were or could be intelligent became the central question of cognitive science and the question was raised in its modern form by Alan Turing.
- In 1950, Turing published a paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” that defined the field of artificial intelligence and established the program of cognitive science.
- The paper began with “I propose to consider the question, Can machines think?
Turing test
- Given that the meaning of think was and is so unclear, Turing proposed to set his question more concretely “in terms of a game which we call the “imitation game”.
- In this game, an interrogator is talking via computer terminal to two respondents, another human and a computer, without knowing which is which.
- The game consists in asking questions designed to tell which respondent is the human and which is the computer.
- Turing proposed that we consider a computer intelligent when it can fool the interrogator into thinking it is a human being.
David Marr: The Levels of Explanation
- Marr was a computational scientist with an interest in vision
- He proposed that often the disagreement between different approaches to understanding mind/behaviour stems from the confusion regarding the levels at which information processing can be understood
Three levels of explanation:
- Computational Theory level:
- What is being done by the system? What is the goal and why is it appropriate?
- Algorithmic/Representational Level:
- How does the system do what it does? What is the representation for the input and output and what is the algorithm for transformation
- Hardware Implementation (Physical) Level:
- How can the representation and algorithm be realised physically? Mind, computer, etc
Interdisciplinary nature of cognitive revolution/cognitive science
- At least six different disciplines were involved in cognitive revolution then and in what is broadly known as cognitive science now
- Philosophy, linguistics, anthropology, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, psychology
- Many scholars became familiar with and tolerant of work in other disciplines
-
-
-
-