Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
TOPIC 4: Structure and Departmentalization of the Firm - Coggle Diagram
TOPIC 4: Structure and Departmentalization of the Firm
4.1 Introduction
Organizing: dividing and coordinating work among people and groups
Internal factors: objectives, strategic plans, organizational capacity
External factors: environment where the firm operates
Organizational Design: choosing structure suitable for strategy, personnel, technology, tasks
Organizational Structure: way of dividing, organizing, and coordinating activities
No single best structure; depends on context and individuals
Key questions for structure design:
Departmentalization
Chain of command
Work specialization
Span of control
Centralization vs. decentralization
Formalization
Real structure = formal + informal structure combined
4.2 Departmentalization and Organizational Chart
Departmentalization: process that enables specialization and division of labor
Groups activities to simplify and improve control
Department: unit with autonomy and size for managerial function
Organizational Chart: diagram showing hierarchy and functions
Displays positions, roles, and communication lines
Shows formal structure of the firm
Horizontal growth → departmentalization
Vertical growth → levels of authority and hierarchy
4.3 Types of Departmentalization
Functional Departmentalization
Advantages: specialization, simpler training, uses experience
Disadvantages: excessive specialization, coordination problems, narrow vision
Groups activities by main business functions (marketing, finance, production, HR)
Geographical or Territorial Departmentalization
Advantages: local focus, proximity to customers and suppliers, management training
Disadvantages: service duplication, control difficulties
Groups activities by region or area
Product Departmentalization
Each division operates independently
Advantages: product focus, accountability, coordination, supports diversification
Groups by product or service line
Disadvantages: duplication of services and higher costs
No ideal type; depends on environment and firm strategy
Customer Departmentalization
Groups by customer type (age, purchasing power, etc.)
Advantages: focus on customer satisfaction, coordination, product diversification
Disadvantages: costly, duplication of services
Matrix Departmentalization
Dual command: two superiors (functional and project)
Encourages teamwork and horizontal communication
Combines functional + product/project structures
Advantages: flexibility, innovation, result orientation, knowledge sharing
Disadvantages: conflicts, stress, high administrative cost
Self-managed Teams / Mini-factories
Example: Basque firms (Artetxe “minifábricas”, Maier “Olatxus”, Orkli “taldes”)
Key features: autonomy, uneven distribution of power, redundancy
High autonomy and decentralization
Advantages: adaptability, creativity, productivity, better coordination, quick problem detection
Teams decide on operations and management aspects
Disadvantages: redundancy of assets, power imbalance, fewer middle managers
Composite or Mixed Departmentalization
Common in real firms
Not the same as matrix (matrix = formal dual structure)
Combination of several types at different organizational levels
4.4 Types of Authority and Delegation
Authority must match responsibility
Responsibility: duty to perform assigned tasks
Authority: right to command and power to be obeyed
Personal authority: based on manager’s qualities
Legal authority: right attached to position
Types of Authority
Line (formal): direct, hierarchical control based on position
Staff: advisory, based on expertise, no direct command
Functional: right to issue orders across departments for a specific function
Delegation
When a superior transfers authority to a subordinate to carry out tasks
Delegate assumes responsibility but superior keeps accountability
Good delegation characteristics:
Delegate to capable people
Match authority with responsibility
Avoid interference or micromanagement
Clear objectives
Use appropriate control methods
Difficulties in delegation:
From delegator: perfectionism, mistrust, fear of losing prestige
From subordinate: lack of confidence, fear of criticism, no motivation
4.5 Centralization and Decentralization
Centralized firm: decisions made by top management
Decentralized firm: decisions made by lower levels
Distribution of power = key structural characteristic
Factors influencing decentralization:
Firm size
Product and service diversification
Training and skills of employees
Internal communication effectiveness
Adequate communication systems
Degree of decentralization increases when:
Decisions are more important
More functions are affected
More decisions made at lower levels
Less control from top management
Advantages of Decentralization
Increases motivation
Enables performance comparison among units
Promotes decision-making and responsibility
Facilitates diversification and flexibility
Frees top management
Develops future managers
Disadvantages of Decentralization
Possible loss of control
Limited by poor control systems or lack of trained managers
Coordination difficulties
May increase costs and reduce economies of scale
Harder to maintain uniform policies