Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Globalizzazione dawla e società, Lezioni, Books - Coggle Diagram

- - - - Estado-Nacion
        
        Demos = ethnos
- - - - Opposite of massification
    - - Among people
      - Among equals
- - - - The diaspora is past
    - - Ended up creating more stateless people
    - - It is for Iran
  - - - Decolonization
      - Ex. sudafrica
      - Alternatives
        
        Federation
  - - - Local elites connected w ottomas
- - - - Forced
      - Antitetici
        
        Ex. hungary 56
    - - Power
  - - - 2 ethnos and one demos
- - - - keep producing horrors like holocaust and gaza
  - - - Mistakes
        
        They aren't disproportionate responses
        
        There is no threat
- - - - Violence may be necessary
    - - No violence
      - Solid institutions are necessary
        
        Townships weren't kept
        
        Jefferson
      - Hungarian revolution as prime example: soviet tanks against soviets
      - u can create thanks to natalità
      - Councils
        
        Institutionalization of daytoday practices
        
        Made cause citizens aren't heard
        
        Urna not enough
        
        More sources of power
    - - Experience in self goverment
      - Distribution of power - Montesquieu
        
        Arendt wants to multiply it
      - Slavery and colonialism
      - Preferred by arendt
    - - Comes from atronomy: trayectory of planets
      - Used in politics since the 18th century as a capovolgimento
      - For arendt means also to return to the beginning
- - - - Philosophies based on the individual and not the plurailty
        
        There is no identity without plurality
      - Nation-States
        
        U loose your rights when you aren't part of the demos
        
        Contemporary danger: masses of people outside the demos
      - Totalitarism tries to destroy human liberty :<3:
        
        How?
        
        Three phases
        
        1) Destruction of juridic person
        
        2)Destruction :<3: of morality
        
        3) Destruction of uniqueness
        
        Omologazione
  - - - No pol action
      - No pol opinion
- - - - Left wing
        
        Rabin
        
        Lasare
        
        Non-nationalistic
      - Right wing
  - - - Assimilation as racist blackmail
- - - - Gender studies
    - - Intersectionalist
      - Indian
      - Critical regionalism
        
        the global south doesn't have to omologate
    - - Ethic can't be individual
        
        based on vulnerability
        
        for B. and S. on the restrain from causing harm
        
        Action to prevent that
        
        For classic occidental thinkers on limiting the other's ability
        
        Ex. "War" on terrorism
        
        Nation state as unifier of a group into an individual to protect its interests
        
        Negative liberties
        
        War as continuation of politics
  - - - Schmitt
      - Agamben
- - - - examples of collaboration
    - - Arendt opposes this
- - - - Suspend laws for other ethos
        
        Dispensability leads to killability
- - - - Thousands of palestinians killed
      - Segregation
    - - Historical examples
    - - Symmetric warfare
      - It wasn't the objective
  - - - Colonial and racist rethoric and dicothomy
      - Avamposto - Herzl
    - - Ai program
      - Large amounts of targets produced
      - Quick authorization
      - Produces the destruction that we see
      - Works thorugh surveillance
    - - Half of Israel's population
      - Jews from africa, asia, middle east
      - Discriminated in Israel and forced to assimilate
      - Expelled from their original arabi countries and became israelis
      - Had their own history in the middle east
        
        Israel doesn't talk about it
    - - Neither black nor white
      - Transferred culture with blacks
        
        Stopped by zionism
      - Blackfaces to integrate
    - - Kibbutz
      - Weapons from cechoslovakia in 48
      - Suez crisis
    - - U.s. never question their support
      - Ungratefullness of israel
  - - - High support in Germany and in the west
        
        Moral and anti-islamic intent
  - - - Reported by medias
  - - - Ex. Haavara accords
      - Didn't have success
        
        Both parties hated each other
    - - Risk of losing the holocaust memory's value
  - - - 7amas usesthe wrong means
      - Israel has the wrong end
    - - Product of
        
        Repression
        
        Blocked peaceful means
      - Rave party beside the wall
      - Comparison with Nakba
    - - war rapes
  - - - Peace hould be imposed
  - - - Eu as example
    - - Democracy for jwes
      - Dictatorship for palestinians
    - - Ba7rain
      - Sudan
      - Maghreb
    - - Unfeaseble
        
        Would require double ethic cleansing
      - Trublesome
        
        would leave two states that hate eachother as neighbors
    - - palestinian refugees
      - A small israel surrounded by big enemies
- - - - as juridic entity
        
        Binds and unbinds
        
        Forcefully
      - As condition
      - Creates the nation
        
        Creates the stateless
        
        Containment and expulsion
        
        Difference: where's the inside and where's the outside
    - - Absence of peacetime rights
        
        Less laws doesn't mean more freedom
      - Ex. iraq
    - - Ex. nakba
    - - Objective
        
        Making the prisoner's life miserable
      - Prisoners are outside the law because they have no consitutional rights
        
        But this state is produced deliberately
        
        Private sphere in arendt
    - - Critical regionalism
        
        Federations that guarantee social rights
        
        No nationalism
      - Contraddizione performativa
        
        stateless should protest to claim rights
    - - Focused on exile
      - The one who pnly lives in the private sphere is both inside and outside
      - Polis as model
        
        Critique: segregated people
      - Federalism allows plurality
      - Statelessness: pol phenom of the 20th century
    - - The possibility to claim it
        
        How does a State take away it?
        
        By categorizing
        
        A nation-state includes some and excludes some from citizenship
        
        Non-citizens can preserve their culture, work, have families
        
        But they are in an uncertain state
        
        In time of crisis this can emerge
        
        They have some problems
        
        Ex. racism
  - - - Agamben
      - Outside of the politial
    - - Caused by global capital
    - - Keeping it as structure
        
        wefare
        
        Global capital doesn't want that
      - Femminism can help with that since it already delas with minorities