Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

IMPLICATIONS OF NATURAL BOUNDARIES FOR PLACEMAKING AS A COLLABORATIVE …

- - - - Along with the advanced wildlife policies and the human & animal contact that contributes to the positive and collaborative placemaking relationship between them
      - With the integrations of humans and animals it shows that coexistence is possible through placemaking
    - - Ecotourism was the main source revenue for the facilities
      - Ecotourism portrayed the coexistence between wildlife and the protection of it into placemaking practices of human ecotourists
      - Ecotourism was a catalyst for contribution to the economy and livelihoods of humans from Costa Rica, cultivated their sense of stewardship for the wildlife
- - - - Because the forests are protected it resulted in a vast amount of wildlife habitats being preserved/untampered
      - Areas where physical boundaries were met both humans and animals were seen but they coexisted and respected each other
      - Wildlife corridors not only serve to protect the wildlife but also to ensure human activity doesn't cause a interruption to the animals
    - - Cohabitation between animals and humans was not hard to achieve and was seamless
      - Humans cultivated relationships with rehab residents and local wildlife
      - Wildlife was seen not having fear of humans and was okay with human contact when humans came into their habitats
    - - The larger facilities have issues with the welfare of feeder animals. The protection and placemaking relationship should be for all animals.
      - More research is needed to dive deeper into policies regarding the welfare of all animals despite their purpose