Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
LSAT Logical Reasoning Mastery - Coggle Diagram
LSAT Logical Reasoning Mastery
Core Skills (must be automatic)
Identify the conclusion (main claim)
🔎Spot the evidence (supporting facts/premises)
What Evidence Is
Evidence = Premises → statements that support the conclusion
Provides reasons (facts, opinions, principles, data, examples) the author uses
Without evidence, the conclusion has no foundation
What Evidence Is Not
Conclusion → the claim the argument is trying to prove
Background info → context, scenesetting, not actually supporting
Counterpremises → opposing claims introduced only to be rejected
Common Premise Indicators (Keywords)
Since
Because
For
As
Given that
Seeing that
In view of the fact that
(Not always present, but very helpful clues)
Types of Evidence
Facts/Statistics “Surveys show that 80%…”
Examples “For instance, when X happened…”
Principles/Rules “All citizens have the right to…”
Comparisons/Analogies “Just as in case X, so too in case Y”
Causal Statements “This leads to that…”
Evidence vs Conclusion How to Tell Them Apart
Evidence supports → Conclusion
Ask
“If I take this away, does the argument fall apart?” → If yes = evidence
Tone
Evidence often sounds more factual/neutral
Conclusion often sounds more opinionated, judgmental, or prescriptive
Indicators
Conclusion words
thus
therefore
hence
so
accordingly
it follows that
Premise words
since
because
given that
Tricks Test Makers Use
Hidden premises
unstated but assumed (watch for them)
Evidence first, conclusion last (or reversed)
Don’t assume order
Multiple premises
sometimes several reasons pile up
Intermediate conclusions
a statement can be both a conclusion (supported by earlier premises) and a premise (supporting the final conclusion)
Practice Questions to Ask Yourself
What is the author trying to prove?
Conclusion
What reasons are given to prove it?
Evidence
Does this statement stand on its own, or is it supporting something else?
If I remove it, does the argument lose its foundation?
Understand reasoning structure
how evidence → conclusion
Recognize common flaws
bad leaps
false assumptions
causal mistakes
Translate conditionals (If A → B; contrapositive = If not B → not A)
Handle quantifiers (“all, some, most, none”) precisely
Prephrase predict the answer before looking