Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Pro Case, Con Case, Pro Rebuttal, Con Rebuttal, Pro Final focus, Con Final…
Pro Case
Framework
all living creatures?
matters people will die
humans
benefits
Prevents diseases
key to developing vacinnes
we need to know if it's not dangerous
Heath can make wealth
People can go to work and earn
can live a better life
Con Case
Framework
killing monkeyys is wrong
all human beings and animal lives
all lives should be values
New ways are better (technology)
ai is more efficient and safe
can use computer models simulate
No killing involved
animal rights being harmed
deaths of animals is also abuse to humans
Pro Rebuttal
Testing on living things is more accurate
(tell me why though)
Animals are worth sacrificing to save humans
You have to give data a lot of data
Solvency (defense) save lives whereas (offense) using AI is not as safe and should not be trusted.
Con Rebuttal
Counter
Can use tech to help
relealism can be realistic
Attack: testing an also kill people (but no proof)
Defense
digital is make accurate (save animals)
Money time and lives wasted (offense)
Pro Final focus
Win on mag
research: vacinnes saved millions
animals benefit too
win on prob
other menthods less liekly to be effective
win on timeframe
research is quicker than Ai and vacinnes are more effective for long time
Con Final Focus
win on mag
People and animals both impacted
win on prob
vacinnes won't always work with animal tests
Digitial body takes less time.
Crossfire
How can you prove AI is safe
Worth animal harm because humans are saved
Can use dead animals
It's faster and easier to use - safer because humans researches can get discrated
Dead animals
Crossfire
how can you make AI safer and effiecient?
Develping the Ai can take lots of time, and potential for error
Can replicate body structure just like a real human
Animal research can take more time
Summary (PRO)
Their best arg:
Ai can also harm
water used by the centres is a waste
cause environmental issues + deaths
best arg: Preventing diseases
whole commuity saved
million of lives saved
Con summary
best arg: tech to simulate experiemtnts
efficient
accurate
can get result immediate
Ai
won't lie
Their best arg: preventing dieseases
Animals can carry diseases
Costly and waste resources.
Grand Crossfire
Ai can give wrong results
Ai gets the data from humans
Don't you think the animals deserve a better life?
How will Ai lie?
Can be better than humans
No guarentee it's accurate