Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

PT 2: IS OUR MOST REVERED KNOWLEDGE MORE FRAGILE THAN WE ASSUMED IT TO BE?…

- - - - Why is certain knowledge held in higher regard than others?
      - Is revered knowledge always valid, or just widely accepted?
      - If the definition of “revered” changes, does that reveal fragility or just evolution?
      - Is there any barrier in arts that limits the art from being revered?
  - - - Does the technique changes overtime?
  - - - how have highly respected artist movement can be challenged, reinterpreted or rejected over time?
    - - can an artwork or artistic method ever be "permanent" in meaning, or is fragility inevitable as audiences and cultures shift?
  - - - can reproduction preserve form but erode aura and meaning?
      - is the artist's intention at risk if the original method or context is lost?
- - - - how does subjective interpretation make revered art vulnerable to changing taste or ideological shifts?
      - can an artwork's vulnerable reputation be dismantled if critics lose credibility or authority?
        
        what causes the critics to lose its value?
  - - - what causes their taste to shifts?