Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Pro Case, Con Case, Pro rebuttal, Pro Summary, Con Summary, Con Rebuttal -…
Pro Case
3 days of mental health leave
increase emotional wellbeing
policy helped students have better mental hrealth
be more proactive.
If students don't take breaks, conditions will get worse.
what's your solution
Stree and anxiety
should have choice to stay home
could become serious and effect other people
Con Case
academic disruptions
put their grades at risk
that causes more stress
absence could cut them off from students and teachers who can help
taking away stress - they will have more stress in future and they should learn from stress.
Time off without limit
cause many issues in social systems
that causes more anxiety and stress
cross answer: lessen there stress.
cross answer: won't they do it in the future sucide?
Pro rebuttal
make the problem worse if they don't have the time off
they wn't be able to listen to the teacher
Mental health will become worse
Cross: stress and anxiety - how are they supposed to do well in tests.
Pro Summary
have time to heal
condition will become more dangerous.
anxiety will increase and they will commit sucide.
Becoming isolated will make them more of a target than not leaving and being part of the school.
What if schools don't have money for that?
Con Summary
school helps each other out
students face isolation and miss their freinds
teachers can help
will cause more harm than good
stress is a part of life. Recovery will be slower
allowing students taking time off
extended absenses effects success.
have;t defined guidlines.
reduuces social interactions.
schools should invest in more councilors.
Con Rebuttal
mental health is important
risk worsening problem
harming them
school is a place of socialising
withdrawl increases isolation (ACUL) linking to depression.
not fixing the root cause.
Counter: bullying could be bigger issue.
didn't answer my question
on fixing root problem.
School has the tools to help students recover.