I think leaders with democratic legitimacy or popular support can slide into authoritarian government or behavior—especially if it is driven by grievance, resentment, fear, insecurity, and ambition. Once they go down that path, I think it is pretty hard for them to go back, because the only option they have is to rig the game again and again. In terms of committing more abuses, it actually got me thinking of the president of Turkey. I think that is a cautionary tale for us—to see what it will become if we don’t nip it in the bud in the first place. You can see President Erdoğan in Turkey. He comes from a very humble background, and he felt fundamentally marginalized for 49 years. So when he rose to power, the first thing he wanted to do was turn the table upside down. He stepped on so many toes, he locked up dissenters, he changed the constitutional law to increase his own power, and he purged social media, courts, police, and the military—any of the opposition. And he knows that if he ever loses an election, he will be prosecuted and persecuted. So eventually, it systematically erodes democracy and the checks and balances in Turkey. And I’m not saying Taiwan is Turkey. I’m not saying Lai Ching-te is Erdoğan—probably not yet. But you can see the political rhetoric they use is pretty similar. After he took office, the first thing the Lai administration did was launch a recall campaign targeting 24 opposition lawmakers, due to the fact that he is governing with very limited parliamentary control. And the way he justified it was that he wanted to protect Taiwan from China—which is pretty similar to Turkey, where Erdoğan also claimed all his actions were because of national security. So the logic behind the actions is pretty similar. But the truth is, they just want to get more power.