Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Motivational Theories - Coggle Diagram
Motivational Theories
Frederick Taylor
Scientific Analysis of Work: Taylor believed that the most efficient way to perform a task could be determined through scientific study and analysis, rather than relying on traditional, often inefficient, methods. This involved time-and-motion studies to identify the optimal way to perform a task and break it down into its simplest components.
Specialization and Standardization: Taylor advocated for specialization of labor, where each worker performs a limited set of tasks, becoming highly skilled and efficient in those specific areas. Standardizing work methods and tools further contributed to efficiency gains.
Scientific Selection and Training of Workers: Taylor emphasized the importance of selecting workers based on their aptitude and then providing them with proper training to perform their assigned tasks efficiently.
Cooperation between Management and Workers: Taylor stressed the need for a harmonious relationship between management and workers, with managers planning and directing work, and workers executing the tasks as instructed. He believed that cooperation and mutual understanding were crucial for maximizing productivity.
Productivity-Based Pay: Taylor proposed that workers should be compensated based on their output, incentivizing them to work at a higher pace and rewarding them for increased productivity.
Efficiency as the Goal: The core of Taylor's approach was to increase efficiency and output through scientific methods, with the belief that this would benefit both the company and the workers.
Potential Drawbacks: While Taylor's ideas were revolutionary in their time and significantly impacted industrial practices, they also faced criticism for potentially dehumanizing workers, stifling creativity, and leading to monotonous work. His approach was sometimes seen as overly rigid and focused solely on efficiency at the expense of worker well-being and job satisfaction.
Elton Mayo
Social Needs Matter: Mayo's research highlighted that employees are motivated by a sense of belonging, recognition, and positive social interaction within the workplace.
The Hawthorne Effect: His experiments revealed that simply paying attention to employees, regardless of the specific changes being made, can lead to increased productivity. This phenomenon is known as the Hawthorne Effect.
Teamwork and Collaboration: Mayo's work emphasized the importance of teamwork and collaboration in fostering a positive and productive work environment.
Managerial Involvement: He advocated for managers to be more involved in employees' working lives, showing genuine interest in their well-being and providing support and guidance.
Shift from Scientific Management: Mayo's theories challenged the purely efficiency-focused approach of Taylor's Scientific Management, emphasizing the human element in the workplace.
Foundation for HR: Mayo's work laid the groundwork for the development of Human Resources (HR) departments, which focus on employee well-being and development.
Abraham Maslow
Needs Hierarchy: The original hierarchy includes physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, and self-actualization needs. Later expansions add cognitive, aesthetic, and transcendence needs.
Not Strictly Linear: While Maslow initially proposed that lower needs must be relatively satisfied before higher ones, modern research suggests people often pursue multiple needs simultaneously.
Cultural Variations: Different societies may prioritize needs differently. Individualistic vs. collectivist cultures, for example, can shape which needs take precedence.
Practical Applications: In fields like education, healthcare, and workplace management, Maslow’s framework helps identify barriers to motivation and guides strategies to fulfill various needs.
Criticisms: Maslow’s biographical approach, cultural biases, and the debate over rigid vs. flexible ordering highlight the importance of viewing his theory as a starting point rather than an absolute rule.
Frederick Herzberg
The two-factor theory (also known as Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory) argues that job satisfaction and dissatisfaction exist in two different ways, each with its own set of factors.
This contradicts the traditional view of job satisfaction, which posits that job satisfaction and dissatisfaction are interdependent.
Herzberg and his collaborators investigated fourteen factors relating to job satisfaction in their original study, classifying them as either hygienic or motivational factors. Motivation factors increase job satisfaction, while hygiene factors prevent job dissatisfaction.
Although largely replaced by newer theories of motivation in academia, the two-factor motivation theory continues to influence popular management theory and the methodology of studies in some areas of the world.