Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Theoretical Frameworks - Coggle Diagram
Theoretical Frameworks
1. Pandora’s Box Theory:
Stakeholder's may feel GE may unleash uncontrollable, unforeseen consequences.
-
Ecological: Highlights risk of cascading, unpredictable effects.
-
8. Precautionary Principle:
Stakeholders may feel that biotechnological innovations should be approached with caution, especially under uncertainty.
-
-
-
7. Pluralistic Ignorance:
Respondent's may misjudge others’ beliefs, leading to silence or conformity.
Ethical:Conceals dissent, undermining legitimacy.
-
-
5. Activated Personal Norms:
Respondent's may act based on personal responsibility or stewardship values
-
-
-
6. Emotion-Based Reasoning:
Stakeholders may misjudge others’ beliefs, leading to silence or conformity.
Ethical:Can override rational debate, leading to precaution.
-
Social: Shapes perception via fear, hope, or outrage.
3. Diffusion of Innovation:
Adoption of new ideas/technologies spreads through social networks over time.
-
-
-
2. Theory of Moral Disengagement:
Stakeholders may justify or minimise the ethical consequences of harmful actions to reduce guilt.
-
-
-
4. Cognitive Dissonance:
Discomfort from holding conflicting beliefs leads to rationalisation or attitude change.
-
-
-