Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Under what circumstances, if any, does “verbal coercion” invalidate…
Under what circumstances, if any, does “verbal coercion” invalidate consent to sex?
problem
response
argument
objection
response to objection
however, in this case there is still a lot to be said as the harm caused by unwanted but consensual sex has the consequence of denying or obfuscating
-
I will consider the objection that in most cases the agent is not able to weigh, in that given moment, the set of available options.
e.g 2 - where sex is unwated but voluntary - there was no verbal coercion per se, but more of a persuasion that resulted in valid consent
Given such conditions, what if in cases that we confront an agent whose actions do not accurately reflect their strongest desire? - is this verbal coercion that invalidates consent?
The illegitamte circumstances in which an agent experiences a set of restricted choices that makes the only reasonable option unwanted sex makes consent invalid
-
Conly (2004) responds to this philosophical problem by saying that not all situations where there are constrained choices result in involuntary actions.
-
It follows that verbal coercion occurs when it restricts a set of available options such that there are no reasonable alternatives, and it must do this illegitimately.
-