Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Reflection on Mind-Mapping (Gibbs' Model) - Coggle Diagram
Reflection on Mind-Mapping (Gibbs' Model)
Description
Initially used for basic note-taking
consolidating knowledge
Later applied for:
structuring assignments
Feelings
At the beginning:
Uncertainty about how effective it would be
Difficulty selecting and organizing content
Later:
Satisfaction with visual clarity
Felt more in control of complex information
Evaluation
Strengths:
Identifying links between topics
Summarizing key ideas
Supporting analysis of complex problems
Weaknesses:
Early mind maps were too simple
Lacked deeper analysis and connections
Analysis
Most effective when:
Clear hierarchy of main ideas and subtopics
Use of key terms from the module (e.g. “metacognition”, "cognitive load")
Helped with:
Recognizing gaps in knowledge
Structuring responses more critically
Conclusion
Progressed from basic to critical use
Mind-mapping has become a valuable learning tool
Realized the need for deeper, more specific connections
Action Plan
Enrich them with theoretical concepts and terminology
Review and improve them regularly
Continue using mind maps in future modules
Use for planning assignments and exam preparation