Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Emerging Themes - Staff Perceptions of the College Conduct Procedure &…
Emerging Themes -
Staff Perceptions of the College Conduct Procedure & Student Behaviour
A call for consistency
(staff members' challenging of students' disruptive behaviour is inconsistent).
Conflict of interests
(between attendance / achievement benchmarks and student wellbeing / pastoral concerns. What matters most?)
Differences in Educator values:
Behaviouralist disciplinarians vs Humanistic concerns for welfare
Connotations of language / terminology
Lack of follow-up
(staff expressed frustration re: delayed follow-through by managers when c.c.p has been instigated).
Some staff felt undermined by c.c.p / perceived
'losing face'
Perceived
Ineffectiveness of Stage 3 panel
Need for parental investment
in c.c.p
Powerful influence of location
on student behaviour
Students roaming / congregating
across college in cafes and corridors
Ensuring opportunities for
staff communication and handover
Early Intervention vs Sanction
Some staff called for
stronger sanctions
Importance of
target setting & monitoring
A call for alternative methods
Low levels & disruptive
behaviour as a coping mechanism
One yardstick to measure all
(does the punishment fit the crime?) e.g. attendance / punctuality issues dealt with in same manner as serious offences
Dominance of Attendance / Punctuality concerns
Personalised beh. m/ment approach vs one-size-fits-all
Personal Tutor Group vs other groups
(Greater perceived control over
behaviour of own group)
(all behaviour communicates)
Tutors taking behaviour management into their own hands
Lost faith
(lack of belief in c.c.p for resolving student
behavioural issues)
Lack of staff buy-in
at S1 & S2
Unrealistic expectations
(c.c.p versus reality of student life).