Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
FORENSICS - Coggle Diagram
FORENSICS
CRIMINAL PROFILING
Top-Down (USA)
- pre existing profiles that have already been created, based on interviews from 38 serial killers
DISORGANISED CRIMINALS
DNA at scene, evidence left behind, no proof of pre planning, victim will be present
Anti-social, low IQ, may struggle with relationships, unemployed or have a job with low skill set
ORGANISED CRIMINALS
No DNA scene, limited evidence, unlikely victim would be present, proof of pre planning
Got a family, job, friends, good IQ level, able to communicate efficiently
A03
-
- assuming certain types of people commit crimes, lead to discrimination, false arrests, feeding into stereotypes
- difficult to categorise people, different variables that can account for how they've left the crime scene
- pre existing profiles were all done on serial killers (certain type of person) and in the 70s - due to increase in technology people have much more knowledge about crime, people know what police are looking for
Bottom-up (UK)
- data driven, no pre-existing profiles
- access how they've treated the victim (electively violent may suggest ill-intent, anger issues, based on relationships or childhood) and how they've left the crime scene (clean - intelligent person, suggest certain professions etc) EQUIVALATE TO PROFILING
- use geographical profiling, uses circle theory (figure out where the person is living) - the immediate circle (crime scene and local area) and the wider circle (slightly further out that can access the crime scene) CATEGORISE THEM - commuter or marauder (lives in the same area that the crime has taken place)
- offers a profile for the person as well as location
A03
- really good, holistic approach, can identify location and person
- data driven - personalised to each criminal (more accurate)
- use it for wider range of crimes, major and minor
-