Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Chap 4: Writing Strategies and Ethical Considerations, readers need to…
-
- readers need to better understand topic
- what readers know little about
- what you propose to study
- setting + ppl you will study
- methods to provide data
- analyze data
- validate findings
- ethical issues
- preliminary results show about practicability and value of study
-
-
-
- introduction
- statement of problem
- existing literature
- significance of study
- purpose of study
- research questions
- procedures
- philosophical assumptions
- qualitative research strategy
- role of researcher
- data collection procedures
- strategies for validating findings
- proposed narrative structure of study
- anticipated ethical issues
- preliminary pilot findings
- expected outcomes
-
- introduction
- statement of problem
- advocacy issue
- existing literature
- significance of study
- purpose of study
- research questions
- procedures
- philosophical assumptions
- qualitative research strategy
- role of researcher
- data collection procedures
- collaborative approaches with participants
- data recording procedures
- data analysis procedure
- strategies for validating findings
- narrative structure
- anticipated ethical issues
- significance of study
- preliminary findings
- expected advocacy/participatory changes
-
- introduction
- statement of problem
- purpose of study
- theoretical perspective
- research questions/hypotheses
- review of literature
- methods
- type of research design
- population, sample, participants
- data collection instruments, variables, and materials
- data analysis procedures
- anticipated ethical issues in the study
- preliminary studies or pilot tests
- introduction
- research problem
- past research on problem
- deficiencies in past research
- one related to each quantitative and qualitative data collection
- audience that will profit from study
- purpose
- reason for mixed methods study
- research question/hypotheses
- philosophical foundation for using mixed method research
- literature review
- methods
- definition of mixed methods research
- type of design used and its definition
- challenges in design
- data collection and analysis
- quantitative and qualitative
- mixed method data analysis procedures
- validity approaches
- ethical issues
- timeline
- write ideas down rather than talk about them
- work on several drafts rather than polishing the first draft
- do not edit at early stage
- first develop outline
- second, write draft then shift ideas
- lastly, edit and polish each sentence
- priority principle
- write while fresh
- avoid writing binges
- write in small, regular amounts
- schedule writing tasks
- keep daily charts
- time spent writing
- page equivalents finished
- percentage of planned task completed
- plan beyond daily goals
- share writing w friends
- work on 2-3 projects concurrently
- warm-up exercise
- consistent terms
- types of thoughts
- umbrella thoughts: core idea
- big thought: specific ideas, elaborate upon umbrella thoughts
- little thoughts: reinforce big thoughts
- attention thoughts: keep reader on track, organizational statements
- coherence
- ideas tie together
- logically flow
- hook-and-eye
- active voice
- strong verbs
- appropriate verb tenses
- past tense or present perfect tense: literature review, procedures
- past tense: results
- present tense: results, conclusions
- trim fat
- remove excess words: modifiers, prepositions, the-of constructions
- identify a problem that will benefit individuals being studied
- will not further marginalize participants
- pilot project to establish trust
- convey purpose of study
deception: participants understand one purpose but the researcher has different purpose
- specify sponsorship of study
- don't put participants at risk
- research plan reviewed by Institutional Review Board
- consider special needs of vulnerable ppl
- informed consent form
- identification of researcher, sponsoring institution, how participants were selected, purpose of research, benefits for participating, level and type of participant involvement, risks
- guarantee confidentiality
- participants can withdraw
- respect research site
- collect data so that all groups benefit from treatment
- interviews
- possibility of harmful, intimate information being disclosed
- surveys: disassociate names from responses
- qualitative research: use aliases/pseudonyms
- data needs to be kept for a reasonable period of time before discarded
- ownership of fata
- accurate account of information
- language isn't biased against perons bc of gender, sexual orientation, race, disability, age
- unbiased, sensitive language
- acknowledge participants in a study
- no suppressing, falsifying, inventing findings to meet a researcher's/audience's needs
- not exploit labour of colleagues
i.e. gift authorship, ghost authorship
- release details of research so readers can determine credibility of study themselves