Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

MPH Clonsilla - Coggle Diagram

- - - - Cost efficiency
      - Transparency
      - QA is achieved (to prescribed Specs)
      - Provides Market Insights
      - Broad selection of Contractors possible
    - - Time consuming
      - Potential for lowballing
      - Potential for non-competitive tenders
      - Quality risks, if price too low
      - Inflexible once contract awarded
      - Administratively heavy
  - - - Early Contractor Involvement
      - Flexibility - scope and design
      - Time Savings - quicker than traditional tendering
      - Cost control - ongoing review / assessment of costs
      - Quality- ongoing collaboration => higher quality
    - - Potential for higher costs - non competitive may not lead to lowest costs
      - Perceived lack of transparency - can lead to disputes
      - High dependency on relationships and trust
      - Limited market insights without multiple bids
      - Complaceny - contractor may be less competitive
  - - - Single Point of Contact
      - Speed & Efficiency
      - Cost Certainty
      - Enhanced Collaboration
      - Reduced Client Burden
    - - Less Design Control
      - Potential Conflict of Interest (Cost v Quality?)
      - Limited Design Flexibility
      - QA challenges across Design & Construction
      - Dependent on Contractor's competence (in Design & Construction)
  - - - Early Engagement / Involvement
      - Flexibility in Design / Scope during Construction
      - MC brings expertise to table
      - Single Point of Responsibility
      - Cost savings (early tendering, design & construction overlap)
    - - Cost uncertainty (MC gets fee on top of build costs)
      - Complexity of MC role (managing / coordinating multiple trade contracts).
      - Risk Transfer - majority goes to MC but some remain with Client (eg works may start before design complete, etc.)
      - Disputes between MC and Contractors - can lead to delays etc. Scoping of trade packages and accompanying design is vital.
      - Lack of Control for Client, as MC runs the show.
- - - - Tried and tested
      - Costs known
      - Familiarity of build
      - Client retains element of control on design
      - Competitive bidding
      - Clear roles and responsibilities / scope
    - - Longer timelines
      - Potentail for higher costs
      - Adversarial relationships / contract arrangements
      - Limited flexibility once started
      - Potential miscommuniation / incomplete design
  - - - Speed and efficiency
      - Quality Contorl
      - Sustainability
      - Cost certainty
      - Reduced on-site disputes / scope certainty
- - - - Design
      - Construction
      - Site
      - Financial
      - AHB
      - Political / External
  - - - Generate following workshop
      - Quarterly review /update
      - Key mitigation measures / tracking