PT2 Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be? Discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge
keywords
revered knowledge
fragile
linking
knowledge that is highly respected or venerated by individuals or societies, often seen as foundational or unquestionable.
What is considered as revered knowledge?
assume
Easily broken or susceptible to damage
idea that knowledge can be delicate or easily disrupted
What makes certain knowledge more fragile than others?
What knowledge do we revere the most?
is the revered knowledge more fragile than what we think
oldest?
influencial
many people know
efforts are made to preserve
What assumptions do we make about the durability of revered knowledge?
Is knowledge revered universally, or does it depend on cultural, historical, or social context?
Can the reverence for certain knowledge prevent people from questioning it?
Is fragility always a negative trait in knowledge, or can it signify openness to growth and change?
Does fragility in knowledge indicate a flaw in its foundation, or a normal process of knowledge evolution?
Does fragility suggest that knowledge is dynamic and adaptable, rather than static and unchangeable?
Why do we assume that knowledge that has been revered for centuries or millennia is more solid than it might be?
To what extent do we assume that because something is revered, it is inherently true or lasting?
Do we assume that knowledge becomes stronger the longer it is revered, or does reverence make it more prone to challenge?
revered knowledge + fragile
more fragile + assume
assume + revered knowledge
Can fragile knowledge still be valuable?
Do we assume that because something has been revered for centuries, it is inherently true or will continue to be valid?
Is it possible that revered knowledge is more vulnerable to being overturned because it has not been rigorously questioned in a long time?
revered knowledge is widely accepted, it can be fragile because it not have been questioned for a long time leaving it vulnerable to new evidence or perspectives that can overturn it.
how can new knowledge be fragile?
to what extent does the fragility of revered knowledge depend on the area of knowledge?
AOK
THE ARTS
HISTORY
arts?
history?
How does the fragility of revered knowledge impact societal or cultural values that are built on it?
To take something for granted without proof
How do we determine which knowledge should be revered and which should not?
information or beliefs that are held in high esteem by individuals or societies.
Can revered knowledge be questioned or challenged without losing its status?
who determines revered knowledge?
authority?
What role do authority figures play in establishing revered knowledge?
what caused knowledge to be fragile?
click to edit
How does the fragility of knowledge impact its acceptance in different cultures?
lead to its dismissal or rejection?
How do different areas of knowledge handle assumptions differently?
- who is consider our?
revered knowledge more fragile
revered knowledge is already fragile but...
is it more fragile that we assume?
what caused knowledge do be fragile at the first place
why do we assume RV to be fragile?
How do assumptions shape our understanding of knowledge?
Revered knowledge, despite its high esteem, can be fragile and subject to change with new evidence or perspectives.
more fragile than we assume?
less fragile than we assume
how fragile do we assume that knowledge to be?
Will the knowledge last forever?
do we take these things for granted?
can't imagine a world without them
this knowledge is important, therefore it always going to remain intact
the fragility make it suprising
we know the knowledege is fragile
that's why we protect them!!
When new evidence or perspectives challenge this revered knowledge, its fragility becomes apparent, showing that our assumptions were misplaced.
Why do we assume that long-established knowledge is less fragile?
To what extent does the new evidence or perspective can challenge our assumption that on the fragility of the knowledge?
How does the recognition of fragility of knowledge impact its continued reverance?
Do our assumptions about the strength of knowledge actually hide how vulnerable it really is?
Can society function if we constantly think knowledge will change, or do we have to assume it’s stable for practical reasons?
most revered knowledge + more fragile + than our assumption
assumption that revered knowledge is correct or beyond doubt simply because it has been held in high regard for a long time or by important figures or institutions
Do we assume that revered knowledge is beyond doubt because of who supports it, rather than because it’s actually true?
Why do we assume that revered knowledge doesn’t need to be challenged?
Can revered knowledge become outdated, even if we assume it to be timeless?
Can knowledge be revered because of its emotional or cultural significance, even if it’s not factually correct?
If we assume certain knowledge is unquestionable, do we miss out on new or different ways of thinking?
The more we revere certain knowledge, the less likely we are to question its basis, which creates an assumption of stability. But new discoveries or shifts in thinking can expose weaknesses or gaps in this knowledge, showing it to be more fragile than our assumptions allowed for.
What makes revered knowledge more fragile than we assume?
Can knowledge still be revered if its fragility is exposed?
Once revered knowledge is shown to be fragile or incomplete, can it still hold the same level of respect or trust?
How do our assumptions prevent us from recognizing the fragility of revered knowledge?
Do we ignore signs that revered knowledge could be flawed because of the assumptions we’ve built around it?
Does the fragility of revered knowledge suggest that we should be more cautious in assuming its stability?
Should we always question revered knowledge, or does its long-standing acceptance make it trustworthy enough despite its fragility?
good knowledge - we revere - not fragile
RLE 1
CUBISM ART MOVEMENT
what is the artistic revered knowledge (in paintings/producing art)?
renaissance