It could be argued that Freud’s views majorly only applied to him, and would otherwise be difficult to generalise. His views also fail to consider the multiple levels at which religions can exist, posing a pluralism objection. More of his particular ideas like wish fulfilment, the primal horde and the Oedipus complex have no solid foundation of evidence. With the Oedipus complex, for example, each demographic and each society have their individual views on fatherhood - not all align with the other, and some may in fact completely contrast. In terms of wish fulfilment, it could be that we have been created in sensus divinitas - a sense and desire for God (John Calvin). Finally, the primal horde realistically has no evidence to begin with. Overall, it would be fair to disagree with Freud’s views, as they leave many gaps and fail to consider a wider perspective.