Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
PT 2: Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be? …
PT 2: Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be?
AOK: Arts and another
revered
analysis
believe to be true
to look up to something
deep respect
honored
devotion
sacred
to regard something highly
question
how do one decide a knowledge is revered?
does same community = same revered knowledge?
matter of perspective
does everyone have their revered knowledge?
does re-evaluation means that the knowledge is no longer revered?
does reverence of knowledge vary for different people?
what is considered a revered knowledge?
how high does a knowledge needed to be regarded for it to be revered?
fragile
questions
are fragile knowledge wrong?
what is the measure of fragility?
what is considered as fragile?
how is a question considered fragile?
is there a standard measurement of fragility?
how does a fragile knowledge of a person differ to another?
analysis
unreliable
could be questioned
likely to change
can be argued
but if the changes made were to ensure its relevance?
weak
questionable
vague
assume
question
what does assumption often leads us to?
misunderstanding
arguments
misled
is a knowledge true if it was assumed?
how to differentiate between knowing and assuming?
where does assumptions came from?
how does it spread?
why does some choose to believe in assumptions?
is an assumption no longer an
assumption when there is proof?
how reliable is the proof?
what are the sources of the proof?
to what extent is the proof related to the assumption?
analysis
thought
to believe something is true or false without proof
expect
wonder
accepting something without questions
assumption
for
how we perceive a knowledge can be influenced by culture and beliefs
some knowledge could be considered vague depending on the sources
not all revered knowledge are solid
knowledge evolves with time; fragility might involve its relevance
is usually protected by institutes, hence changes needed to be reviewed before it was made
knowledge that are shaped by culture will be fragile when viewed from different perspectives
against
knowledge that are revered to many can be reevaluate in order to ensure its relevance
if a revered knowledge is fragile, it would have been discarded a long time ago (historical context)
revered knowledge are most likely revised multiple times before being published
there must be a reason as to why a person regard a knowledge so highly
is revered knowledge not necessarily stable?
Arts
influential theories
contributions to cultural heritage
timeless piece
possible RLEs
music
music
visual art
Leonardo da Vinci's inventions
literature
Jane Austen writing technique
irony
studied by many
themes
social class
gender
relationships
character development
hypotheses
Most revered knowledge in art are not necessarily fragile
due to the prolonged application of it up to this day
history
significant events
influential figures
foundational documents
possible RLEs
Luminiferous Aether
Shroud of Turin
Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC)
some principle used up to this day
Confucius
shaped the Chinese culture
social hierarchy
'filial piety'
shaped Chinese family life and social responsibilities
emphasies on hierarchy
education and meritocracy
moral and ethics
political philosophy
phrenology
hypotheses
In history, even our most
revered knowledge can be fragile
matter of interpretation
reinterpretation
matter of record keeping
incomplete evidence
bias in writing
technological advancement