Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Evaluate the relationship between contemporary diagnostic frameworks and…
Evaluate the relationship between contemporary diagnostic frameworks and mental health stigma, invoking relevant empirical evidence.
-
-
Previous versions Attribution Questionnaire (Johnson-Kwochka et al., 2021)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Final Model: Attribution Questionnaire (Johnson-Kwochka et al., 2021)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public stigma stages
-
-
Stage 3: Prejudice
Emotional response
People who are self-aware can tell themselves that stereotype is not true even though the stereotype is invoked.
DSM's influence at this stage is how much knowledge a person has.
Stage 4: Discrimination
Unfair treatment
at this point, DSM can positive influence. Person with label can ask for accomodation. Special programs for person with disability.
-
Attitude
Controllability
-
Controllable
For example, Hostility and hypercriticism of depressed person
can lead person to relapse.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"the level ofcontrollability predicts the
direction of affect" (Aydogmus, 2020)
-
Stability of a cause
-
-
the level of stability predicts the magnitude of
the affect (e.g., high vs. low anger) (Aydogmus, 2020)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"This ‘problem definition, formulation’ approach rather than a ‘diagnosis, treatment’ approach would yield all the benefits of the current approach without its many inadequacies and dangers."
-
-
-
"confidence in the ability to exert control over one's own motivation, behavior, and social environment."
-
-
-
-
On Being Sane in Insane Places. Science, 179(4070), 250-258.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-