Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Do historians and human scientists have an ethical obligation to follow…
Do historians and human scientists have an ethical obligation to follow the directive: “do not ignore contradictory evidence”? Discuss with reference to history and the human sciences.
ethical obligation
-
How do ethical obligations influence the way historians and human scientists handle evidence that contradicts their existing theories or narratives?
Is the ethical obligation to acknowledge contradictory evidence universal, or does it depend on the context?
-
To what extent do ethical obligations influence the transparency and openness of historians and human scientist?
contradictory evidence
How can the presence of contradictory evidence shape the progress of knowledge in history and human sciences?
Are some types of contradictory evidence more valuable or relevant than others? How should historians and human scientists determine which contradictory evidence to prioritize?
-
What criteria do historians and human scientists use to evaluate the reliability of contradictory evidence?
Contradictory evidence refers to information, data, or observations that directly oppose existing theories within a field of study.
directive
-
What is the role of directives or guidelines in shaping the practices of historians and human scientists?
-
-
-
-