Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Outbreak of World War II in Europe - Coggle Diagram
Outbreak of World War II in Europe
Underlying Causes
World Economic Depression (1929 - 1931)
Events before Great Depression
World trade boomed in late 1920s
Initially, economic prosperity helped reduce international tensions
US provided loans to Germany to stabilise German economy after 1924
Led to French troops leaving Ruhr region
Prosperity ended when the US Stock Market crashed
Effects of Great Depression: Economic Nationalism
Protectionism
Countries including France, UK, US introduced tariffs (on exported goods) to protect their own industries and limit or stop imports. Trading partners did the same, resulting in overall fall in trade volumes
Calling in loans
As the US economy struggled, US banks called in their loans -> led to the collapse of banks and businesses which in turn caused mass unemployment
Rearmament
Countries including UK, Germany, Japan, Itlay began rearmament process to boost industry and create jobs for unemployed
Radicalism
In some countries, Great Depression helped bring radical regimes to power, most notably Nazi Germany. In other states like Italy, it caused existing regimes to adopt more extreme and aggressive policies
Emergence of Authoritarian Regimes
The period of 1930s saw the rise of Nazism in Germany and Fascism in Italy
Nazism in Germany
Germany was rocked by economic and political crisis after WWI. The Great Depression further destabilised Germany, bringing the Nazis to power
Beyond economic recovery, the Nazi party also wanted to reclaim land lost under the Treaty of Versailles, carve out living space (Lebensraum) for Germans in Eastern Europe and destroy communism in Germany and other places
Fascism in Italy
Leader of Italy - Benito Mussolini (since 1922)
Used the Great Depression as an opportunity to tighten his grip on the country by taking over its banks and industries
Wanted to build an Italian Empire around the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa
Felt that Italy had more in common with Germany and started to discuss an alliance which was formalised in 1939
Germany and Italy wanted to redraw their borders -> European peace and stability seemed increasingly fragile by the final years of 1930s
Contributory Causes
The Failure of LON
Failure of Disarmament
Disarmament - key aim of LON -> LON and prominent state actors led international talks to promote disarmament in the 1920s
Attempts at disarmament during the 1920s and 1930s
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
Negotiated outside of the League to limit the size and number of warships held by Britain, France, Japan and US
Organised by the US (Not member of LON)
Ratio of tonnage of captial ships of Britain, US, Japan, Italy and France set at 5:5:3:1.67.1.67
Verdict: SUCCESS
Locarno Treaties (1925)
Negotiated outside the League between Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Poland and Czechoslovakia
Germany accepted its Western borders (Belgian and French borders), including the demilitarisation of the Rhineland
Weimar government agreed to settle any disputed with these countries through the LON
Verdict: Partial Success
League Commission to prepare for World Disarmament Conference (1926)
Failed as Britain and France refused to cooperate
Verdict: Failed
Led to Kellogg-Briand Pact
Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928)
Initiated by U.S. Secretary of State Frank Kellogg & French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand
Negotiated outside the LON between 15 countries, including US, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan
Agreement that force should not be used to settle disputes
But, no clear way to enforce the pact
Verdict: Failed
World Disarmament Conference (1932 - 1934)
Concerned with increasing tensions, the LON managed to persuade the US and 60 other states to attend the World Disarmament Conference
Limiting Offensive Weapons
Conference concentrated on trying to control the destructive power of offensive weapons
Produced resolutions to prohibit the bombing of civilian populations and chemical warfare, and limited the size of artillery and tonnage of tanks
Difficult to get all countries to agree on what offensive and defensive weapons were
Resolutions passed did little to ensure how the limitations on weapons would be achieved
Individual countries used the Conference to raise their own issues
Dealing with Germany
Most countries felt that the terms set out in the TOV should be fairer to Germany, especially terms limiting the size of Germany's military, which was perceived to be unfair.
There were disagreements on what fairer arrangement to be achieved
Option 1 - every country to disarm to the level Germany was forced to
Option 2 - Allow Germany to rearm to a level close to that of other powers
There was reluctance to allow either - experience of attempts in 1920s showed that most countries would not disarm
French Perspective
Wary of Germany - painful experience from WWI - Pressured LON not to take option 2
Demanded that France continued to have larger armed forces than Germany OR Britain and US guarantee to fight alongside them if they fought a war with Germany
Disagreements continued - Britain and US were reluctant to commit themselves to guaranteeing France's future security
Germany was also accusing France and major power for hypocrisy
July 1932 - Germany proposed all countries disarm to it's level
Conference failed to agree on the principle of "equality" - Germany walked out, Conference broke up
Conference reconvenes (Feb 1933)
League's official continued to work behind the scenes with Germany and other powers though the Conference broke up
Dec 1932 - other powers agreed to discuss equality for Germany
Germany agreed to return to discussions - Conference reconvened in Feb 1933
New leader of Germany - Adolf Hitler
Agreed to join the conference and appeared interested in making progress on disarmament
But Hitler wasn't genuinely interested - started rearmament programme
Pretended to engage other partners on issue of disarmament as his commanders were secretly planning for rearmament
May 1933 - Hitler promised not to rearm if other powers agreed to disarm in 5 years - clearly pressuring other powers, especially France
Hitler seemed to be calling for large scale disarmament - can claim to be supporter of peace and progress
But he knew the other powers would not disarm to the same level as Germany as set out in TOV -> Gave justification he needed to rearm Germany
October 1933 - Pulled Germany out of Disarmament Conference and LON
Abyssinian Crisis (1934 - 1936)
Origins of Abyssinian Crisis
1896 - Italian troops tried to invade Abyssinia but defeated by poorly equipped army of tribesmen
Mussolini wanted revenge, also wanted fertile land and mineral wealth of Abyssinia
Wanted glory and conquest
Mussolini's style of leadership clamoured for military victories
Events
December 1934 - Dispute between Italian and Abyssinian soldiers at Wal-Wal oasis in Abyssinia
Mussolini used it as an excuse and claimed the oasis as Italian territory and demanded apology from Abyssinia
He began preparing Italian army to invade it
Abyssinian Emperor Haile Salassie appealed to the LON for help but was unsuccessful
On the surface, Britain had the influence and resources to act decisively on Abyssinia's behalf
Location of Britain's and France's colonies also meant that both countries could send troops to defend Abyssinia - they chose not to do so
LON loses credibility - Hoare-Laval Pact
Abyssinian Crisis damaged global confidence in the LON for good
Hoare-Laval Pact leaked details damaged reputation of LON
Failure to impose sanctions on Italy decisively led to Italian takeover of Abyssinia - Hitler was convinced that LON would not be able to hinder Germany's plan of expansion
Details of Hoare-Laval Pact
Areas of Abyssinia would be given to Italy
Abyssinians to lose 66% of their land, and only keep the mountainous region while Italy gets the fertile farmland
Britain and France made this agreement with Italy in secret because they were fearful of an alliance between Mussolini and Hitler
In the midst of the crisis, German troops marched into the Rhineland in March 1936
This was an act against TOV - LON did nothing
Eroded credibility and showed ineffectiveness in resolving conflicts and maintaining world pace
Nov 1936 - Italy and Germany signed Rome-Berlin Axis -> LON could do nothing about it
Lack of authority in enforcing peacekeeping measures resulted in collapse of collective security
By 1930s, LON's reputation had declined
1931 - Japan invaded Manchuria and LON had reacted slowly and ineffectively
By 1935 - many states begun to lose faith in the LON
Nazi Germany's Aggressive Foreign Policy
Nazi Party believed in an aggressive form of nationalism - putting Germany and its people above anyone or anything else
Offered radical solutions to Germany's economic problems
Massive rearmament programme
State control of industry and state investment in projects such as road building
Getting rid of TOV to end reparation payments and reclaim territories that were lost
Mein Kampf highlighted Hitler's foreign policy aims:
Abolish TOV
Destroy communism
Get lebensraum for Aryans who should create empire to rule over the inferior races
Enforce militarism
Leaving the LON (1933)
Referendum organised by Nazi government -> Germans in favour of withdrawing fron LON
Hitler withdrew Germany in October, on the basis that Germany was treated unequally, espcially on issue of German rearmament
Undermined the authority of the LON
Rearmament (1933 - 1935)
Nazis began rearmament in 1933 though specifically banned under TOV
Thousands of unemployed workers drafted into army to reduce unemployment
Germany began to build armed forces at first in secret
By 1935, Hitler no longer bothered to hide the rearmament program
Held a Freedom to Rearm rally in Berlin
Concerns grew over Germany's military build-up (Britain, France, Poland, USSR and Czechoslovakia)
Disarmament Conference (1934)
Hitler walked out of the LON's Disarmament Conference
Claimed that Germany was not treated equally
Major blow to the chances of a disarmament agreement and Conference ended soon after
Saar Plebiscite (1935)
The Saar region was run by LON since 1919
Hitler came it should be part of Germany
LON forced Hitler to agree to plebiscite which resulted in 90% of the Saar voting to join Hitler's Germany
This further increased Hitler's power and confidence
Remilitarisation of Rhineland (1936)
TOV banned German forces from entering Rhineland region, acting as a border for France
Hitler declared it was no longer acceptable -> France and USSR agreed on Treaty of Mutual Assistance in Feb, promising to protect each other against Germany
Hitler claimed he was encircled and thus had the right to place troops on his own borders
March 1936: ordered German troops into Rhineland
A huge gamble as German army still not as strong enough to stand up against French response
However, Britain, France and LON were preoccupied with Abyssinian Crisis
Britain would not guarantee support for France if France challenged Hilter
LON condemned Hitler but no further action was taken
Hitler gained more prestige and confidence in the eyes of the German
Spanish Civil War (1936)
Civil war in Spain broke out between Republicans and Nationalists in July
Nationalist leadder General Franco - held beliefs like Hitler and Mussolini so they helped send troops, aircrafts, and equipment
Gave Hitler the opportunity to test his Luftwaffe (air force) and army
Might of German air force was demonstrated when they bombed Republican strongholds, resulting in casualties
Britain and France stayed out of the Spanish Civil War
Encouraged Hitler as he believed that Britain and France were not prepared to go to war
USSR became suspicious of Britain and France because of their reluctance to oppose Hitler and Mussolini
Anti-Conmintern Pact (1936)
With rising tensions in Europe, Japan was expanding aggressively in Asia
Germany and Itlay saw similarities with military dictatorship in Japan
1936 - Germany and Japan signed Anti-Comintern Pact to oppose the Communist International (Comintern)
Comintern was set up by USSR to spread communism by promoting uprising around the world
Members of the anti-comintern pact agreed not to sign any treaties with USSR
Axis Alliance (1937)
Italy signed the Anti-Comintern Pact
New alliiance between these 3 powers - Axis Alliance
Failure of Appeasement
Factors affecting Britain's and France's Decision-Making in the 1930s
US isolationism
After WWI USA adopted policy of isolationism in 1920s and 30s
Did not want to get involved in European affairs due to loss of human lives it suffered during the war
Thus, help from US against Hitler was not an option
Sympathy for Germany
TOV was widely criticised in Europe
People around Europe felt it was fair for Hitler to argue that Germany was unfairly treated if it had to disarm and other countries were unwilling to do so
Few spoke up when Hitler reclaimed that Saar and Rhineland
Politicians aware of sympathy people had for Germany
Prioritising National Interests
Britain
Much of 1930s - More worried about Stalin and USSR than Hitler
Saw Germany as a useful barrier against USSR
-> E.g. 1935 - Signed Anglo-German Naval Agreement with Germany - Allowed it to build navy up to 35% of the size of the British navy -> Broke the TOV
France
More worried about Hitler than Stalin - France and Germany share a border
Since Britain did not formalise a treaty with them, they turned to USSR in 1936 and signed the Treaty of Mutual Assistance
Alarmed the British and created more sympathy for Germany, which helped them reoccupy the Rhineland with little opposition
Misjudgement of Hitler
British and French politicians could neither comprehend the real threat that Hitler and his ideology posed nor foresee the events that followed
Result: Policy of Appeasement adopted by Britain and France in 1930s -> Giving in to the demands of Hitler
1937 - British PM Neville Chamberlain continued to pursue the policy of appeasement
He was aware of potential threat posed by Hitler
During this time, he authorised massive spending on rearmament for Britian and recognised that Britain and France needed to support each other
Anschluss with Austria (1938)
1938 - Hitler targeted his homeland Austria - wanted to unite the Germans of both Germany and Austria
Austria was a great power before WWI and they were keen to be part of Hitler's new and successful Germany
TOV forbade it but did not stop Hitler
Strong Nazi party in Austria - was instigated by Hitler to have an Anschluss with Germany
Hitler initially created chaos in Austria but convinced Austrian chancellor, Kurt Schuschnigg that order could only be restored if German troops moved into Austria
Schuschnigg appealed to Britain and France to put pressure on Hitler to withdraw but nothing was done
Hitler marched troops into Austria in March 1938
Through voter intimidation and fraud, 99.75% of Austrian voters approved of Anschluss
Consequences of Anschluss for international relations
With Anschluss, Germany absorbed Austria's population, industry and natural resources and had access to their gold -> Strengthened Germany's size and stature
Also raised Hitler's power and standing -> He was breaking TOV but Britain and France did nothing
Britain sympathised with Germany as they felt TOV was unfair and that Germans should be allowed to unite if they wanted to
Britain and France had misjudged Hitler's actions and ambitions - they found it hard to deal with a politician who did not care about rules and traditions of international diplomacy and eventually misunderstood and underestimated him
Sudetenland and the Munich Agreement (1938)
Events leading up to Munich Agreement
Czechoslovakia's leader Edvard Benes was horrified by Anschluss and feared his country was next
Benes asked Britain and France for promises of protection against Hitler - which he received
Hitler was interested in Czechoslovakia, especially Sudetenland as it was largely populated by Germans
Small but active Nazi party in Sudetenland was encouraged to stir trouble and demand to join Germany, like in Austria
In 1938, Hitler claimed to protect the Sudeten Germans and threatened to invade if Czechoslovakia did not hand over Sudetenland
Crisis talks: Agreement at Munich, 1938
Benes was prepared to fight as he had a modern army and support of Britain and France
Both Hitler and Benes did not back down and most thought a war was likely
British prepared for the war by digging air raid shelters
Magazines carried advertisements for air raid protection and gas masks
Cards - instructions about how people could protect themselves from air raids
Mid Sept - situation reached crisis point
Chamberlain made one last effort to avoid war in Czechoslovakia
Sequence of Events
15 Sept - Chamberlain flew to meet Hitler in Bavaria, Germany where Hitler said he would claim parts of Sudetenland with majority of Germans
Chamberlain was convinced that Hitler would be satisfied with his demands
19 Sept - Britain and France convinced Czechoslovakia to surrender parts of Sudetenland Hitler wanted
22 Sept - Hitler increased his demands and wanted the whole of Sudetenland and claimed he needed to rescue Sudeten Germans from being badly treated by the government
Chamberlain told Hitler his demands ere unreasonable and requested a conference with him
29 Sept - Leaders of Britain, France, Italy and Germany had a 4-power summit in Munich
Decided to give in to Hitler's demands without consulting Czechoslovakia or USSR
Agreed that the whole Sudetenland be given to Germany in exchange for pledge of peace from Hitler - MUNICH AGREEMENT
30 Sept - Chamberlain and Hitler published joint declaration that Chamberlain claimed would bring "peace for our time"
Reactions to Munich Agreement
Immediately after signing, newspapers, newsreels in Europe stated that war had been prevented
Chamberlain - greeted by cheering crowds
British media presented the Munich Agreement positively
BUT not everyone favoured the Agreement and had concerns
Opinion polls in Sept 1938 showed that majority of the British did not think appeasement would stop Hitler
Invasion of Czechoslovakia
Oct 1938 - Hitler moved his forces into Sudetenland and claimed it was the end of his demands
15 March 1939 - German troops took over the rest of Czechoslovakia
Czechs were not separated from their homeland by the TOV unlike the Sudeten Germans
Concern that Hitler's next target could be Poland
Britain and France threatened to declare war on Germany if Hitler invaded Poland
Triggers
Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggession Pact, 1939
Hitler's Concern
Hitler set his eyes on Poland as he wanted to reclaim the Polish Corridor and the city of Danzig - Hitler was confident that the Polish forces could be defeated
Though Britain and France threatened to go to war, Hitler thought it was unlikely for them to risk war over Poland
But he was worried that Stalin would oppose Germany's invasion of Poland - since Poland bordered USSR
If USSR opposed Germany, there is a possibility that Britain and France would act too
Germany would risk facing a two-front war - disadvantageous for Germany
Fight Britain and France on the Western Front
Fight USSR on the Eastern Front
Stalin's Concern
His concerns over Hitler grew through 1930s
1934 - Stalin joined LON
1936 - Signed Mutual Assistance Pact with France
He saw that Britain, France and LON had not resisted Hitler when he rearmed Germany and took over territories in Europe
This increased Stalin's concerns about the Munich Agreement
Stalin was not consulted about it and seemed that Britain and France were allowing Hitler to take over Eastern Europe
Signing of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact
Negotiations regarding an alliance against Hitler was ongoing between Stalin, Chamberlain and Edouard Daladier (France PM) in first half of 1939
At the same time, Stalin was meeting Germany's Foreign Minister about a different alliance
On 23 Aug 1939, USSR and Germany signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact
Terms of the Pact
Agreed not to attack each other
Privately agreed to divide Poland between them
Germany agreed to let USSR take Eastern Poland and the Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia
In reality, neither Hitler not Stalin had any faith in the agreement
Stalin decided Britain and France were too weak to stand up against Hitler - he was playing for time get forces ready in case Hitler betrayed him
On the other hand, Hitler got the guarantee that he needed to invade Poland
Invasion of Poland, 1939
Germany's interest in the Polish Corridor and Danzig
Polish Corridor separated Germany from the province of East Prussia
Due to the large population of Germans and desire for transportation line across the Polish Corridor
Since 1939, Germany had taken action to demand the Polish Corridor and Danzig
But Polish leaders rejected these demands
Did not trust Hitler and was concerned about Germany invasion
Tensions between Poland and Germany escalated as talks and negotiations broke down
1 Sept 1939 - Germany invaded Poland
Certain that no opposition from USSR due to the Pact
But miscalculated that Britain and France would not go to war
3 Sept 1939 - Britain and France declared war on Germany, starting WW2