Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

PT2 SELF Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to…

- - - - Who made the criteria?
        
        Is it the same as other area of knowledge?
        
        Can the experts from other area of knowledge use this criteria too?
        
        Can experts from other area of knowlecge question this criteria?
        
        Is revered knowledge used as a form of power or authority?
        
        Will this prevent new production of knowledge that contradicts with the revered knowledge?
      - What makes certain knowledge revered?
      - Why the knowledge holds a high status in area of knowledge?
      - Does the criteria of revered knowledge kept on changing?
        
        Yes
        
        Over the time there'll be a new knowledge that can replaced the once revered knowledge
        
        Can the revered knowledge coexist with other revered knowledge that contradicts with it?
        
        Can the revered knowledge be altered or replaced by other knowledge?
        
        No
        
        What makes the revered knowledge become fragile?
        
        New interpretations
        
        How can we define that the new interpretations is a knowledge that could replaced or debunked or just an add on for the previous revered knowledge?
        
        Discoveries
        
        Challenges to its valdiity
      - Is it influenced by the changing in cultural or social values?
      - Does all revered knowledge a knowledge that received recognition?
      - Is it more reliable or valuable compared to other knowledge?
      - How long does it take for a knowledge to be perceived as a revered knowledge?
        
        Since it tooks LOTS of time (i guess.. gonna find proof for this) for a knowledge to be determine as a revered knowledge..
        
        Is it possible that the knowledge almost become revered (or something) but then a new knowledge (that maybe come with a stronger justification or idk) replaced the knowledge?
        
        If so, does the knowledge still considered as a revered knowledge?
    - - Does it make us biased toward it?
        
        Does the status of producer of the revered knowledge (experts) influence our way of accepting the knowledge?
        
        Are there any limits on how much we can challenge the revered knowledge?
        
        Can this challenges made cause the knowledge to los it staus as revered knowledge?
      - Because of its status in the society, are we more likely to overlook flaws in the revered knowledge?
      - How often do we challenge the revered knowledge?
      - Do we automatically assume revered knowledge as something unquestionable?
        
        Does the status of the experts or the producer of the knowledge itself influence the status of the knowledge? allowing it to be a revered one
        
        Why do we make this assumption?
        
        Are there danger in making assumptions?
- - - - Do our emotional attachments to certain knowledge make us less likely to recognize its fragility
  - - - Does this means that the fragility of the knowledge is only in certain culture?
      - Only in certain society the knowledge is considered as fragile while in the other society system it is considered as a revered knowledge?
  - - - How do we resist acknowledging the fragility of revered knowledge?
  - - - How do we know that knowledge is true and a lasting one?
- - - - Is it simply because it has been respected for a long time?
    - - Why do humans tend to make assumptions about revered knowledge?
        
        trust?
        
        Authority
        
        tradition
        
        Societal consensus
    - - Is there any consequences if started to assume about certain knowledge?
      - Does the assumptions neeed to be based on proof (reseacrh) or just a baseless one in order for it to be consuidered as influencers
      - Are assumptions always implicit, or can they be explicitly recognized in some areas of knowledge?
      - How do assumptions shape the way we acquire and interpret knowledge, particularly in revered knowledge?
    - - are we aware that our assumptions might lead to the discomfort or uncertainty?
    - - What factors might lead us to question or reconsider these assumptions?
- - - - deals with themes of abuse and distorted love.
      - She portrays the symbol of red roses in a different perspectives.
        
        Red roses usually symbolises love and happiness. This is the revered knowledge.
        
        What makes Sexton to use red roses to symbolise something darker. Contrast to the revered meaning of the red roses
        
        rose to signify violence, bruising, and a twisted form of love
        
        Sexton destabilizes our assumption that a red rose represents only beauty or love.
        
        does this action of destabilizing the revered knowledge makes the original knowledge of red roses as beauty or love unacceptable?
        
        she uses juxtaposition
      - challenges traditional or idealized notions of love and protection, using a child's perspective to reveal the painful reality of abuse hidden under euphemisms and imagery of beauty, like roses.