Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
NA出張前作戦会議, Firm Design
• Japan: RME design review includes FDE, vendor…
NA出張前作戦会議
Daily routines
-
-
-
-
16:30 daily wrap up, summarize
by day, by site, by team, in a quip file
-
deliverable/成果物
NA Process Map, by 9/6
Input by each team; Author: Ishii-san,
need to check overall Connection of each process by Ops Eng. team, Wang-san
Narrative paper, each team by 9/8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Business trip report, Kenji
- Firm Design
• Japan: RME design review includes FDE, vendor, and deployment list. North America: No deployment input, potentially due to cost considerations.
o Comment: This review might not be necessary as part of the Engineering Launch Milestone (ELM). We should maintain a consistent global definition of ELM.
- VQ/LV/HV Sampling Inspections
• Japan: Operations Engineering (Ops Eng.) actively participates in pre-launch sampling inspections (VQ, LV, HV) to identify and resolve issues with vendors early. North America: Ops Eng. appears less involved in pre-launch inspections compared to Japan.
o Comment: We need to understand the standards, procedures, and results of vendor-led validations in NA.
- Flexible Package Testing
• Japan: Ops Eng. performs specific flexible package testing during LVQ to address pack line alarm issues before launch.
o Comment: This might not be necessary in NA due to different equipment specifications or needs. Further investigation is required.
- IOQ Failure Rates
• Japan: IOQ (Installation, Operational, and Qualification) failure rate is below 1%, attributed to early engagement and feedback loops via Ozark. North America: IOQ failure rate is around 2%.
o Comment: If issues are ultimately resolved, the initial failure rate might not significantly impact MHE performance. We need to clarify:
Does NA vendors aim to reduce the IOQ failure rate to near 0% like Japan?
How and by when is this progress tracked?
- Ramp-Up and Handover Process
• Japan: Ramp-up includes on-site support from both Ops Eng. and vendors after go-live, ensuring stable MHE performance before handover to RME. North America: Ramp-up is primarily vendor-driven after go-live. RME takes over before the final acceptance test. Vendors provide limited support for three weeks (extendable at additional cost).
o Comment: We need to clarify:
Who resolves issues during ramp-up?
What standards are used for issue resolution?
What are the final acceptance criteria for NA?
What are the metrics used for handover to RME?
- Stress Testing (LTM15)
• Japan: Ops Eng. conducts stress tests to simulate real-world conditions, identify issues early, and incorporate learnings into improvement cycles.
o Comment: The feasibility of stress testing in NA might be limited due to their larger volume compared to Japan.
Additional Points:
• Data-Driven Approach: The document should utilize more data to support findings and analyses.
• OEE Availability: Compare launch site OEE availability using the same criteria for both NA and JP.
• Handling Issues: Compare DPMO (Defects per Million Opportunities) instead of total HIE to account for the difference in statistical methods.
• Scope Focus: Focus on ARS FCs. Gen.10 might be a better comparison than Gen.11 due to potential influence caused by COVID-19 in Gen.11.
• Warranty: Investigate and compare warranty terms (duration and coverage) for MHE in NA vs. JP.
Action Items:
• FDE team: Obtain MHE specifications from NA for comparison and analysis.
• RME team: Investigate and compare warranty terms for MHE in NA vs. JP.