Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
GLA, Tabu , 2 MIP model Vancroonburg , solution quality: comparison…
GLA
difference
-
update utility into matrix, find optimal solution in the matrix, no exchange moves
Exchange/move neighbourhood, find optimal solution
-
whether anticipate, the updating process
-
-
case study (4.3, 4.4)
summary
GLA heuristic is suitable and applicable as decision support system for the daily use in a large hospital.
-
-
Tabu
-
-
-
inherits from local search, by adds memory to search procedure
-
-
-
-
-
2 MIP model Vancroonburg
-
-
problem setting
static context
assignment PxH -> R, for each time unit of their stay that minimizes a certain cost related to these assignments.
extension to an online, dynamic context
Consider dynamics of online patient arrivals, including emergency patients, and explicitly models the length of stay (LOS) of a patient as and estimate.
-
instances
characteristics
Patients. Room, weight c(p,r), avg. occupancy, planning horizon
weights of gender, transfer are corresponding to D et al. and x10 to get interger
-
static problem, use admission scheduling website from Demeester
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
problem
terms in static problem
elective
-
be assigned most appropriate date in hospital, so hospital they can improve occupancy rate
-
-
emergency
-
Hard to schedule, random arrival time
idea is to fix the current assignment of all patients that are in the hospital and to manually adapt the discharge dates.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-