Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
The Challenge of Secularism - Coggle Diagram
The Challenge of Secularism
Freud & Dawkins
Religion as infantile, illusory, irrational non-thinking wish fulfilment
Freud
and
Dawkins
both argue that society would be better off without religion
Freud
says religion comes from the ‘ignorant childhood days of the human race’. Religion is thus the product of an ignorant and childish mind
Freud
said if there was an 11th commandment it would be ‘thou shalt not question’. Religion encourages people to not think for themselves and not question it, giving people a ‘weak intellect’
Dawkins
compared religion to belief in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus. It makes people unscientific and ignorant, encouraging them to take things on faith rather than evidence
Both
Freud
and
Dawkins
say that religious belief comes from fear of death, not rational thought
Evaluation
McGrath
response: religious belief can be rational. He points to
Aquinas’
5 ways as examples of arguments which show that belief in God is reasonable and rational
You can’t really say
Aquinas
is non-thinking or irrational
McGrath
points out that because of arguments like this, many reasonable people convert to religion later in life – including himself and the philosopher
Antony Flew
(the Falsificationism guy)
Flew
started believing in a higher power because of modern versions of the design argument (developments of
Aquinas’
5th way)
So,
Freud
and
Dawkins
are wrong to dismiss all of religion as irrational and childish
Furthermore, many people turn to religion for purpose and meaning and moral guidance. These are not infantile or irrational reasons for belief in God
Freud
and
Dawkins
are certainly right about some religious people – but they are overgeneralizing when applying it to all
The debate over the harmfulness of religion
Dawkins
argues that religion can play a role in prejudice and violence. He said that God is the
‘most unpleasant character in all of fiction’
and an
‘ethnic cleanser … misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal”
– Dawkins
God is a terrible person who encourages prejudice and violence
Dawkins
says religion causes an in-group vs out-group mentality, where people see those not in their ‘group’ as different, dangerous and inferior. Religion is divisive
It encourages you to view those who aren’t in your religion as different.
Dawkins
says this makes religion dangerous and can even cause war
Viewing others as different is the cause of a lot of conflict and prejudice
For example, Catholics and protestants have had many horrific conflicts throughout history
Dawkins
recommends we replace religion with secular humanism, which is a way of having moral values without religion
Evaluation
McGrath
: look at the life of Jesus – that’s the role model for Christians and he was loving to everyone no matter who they were or what their background was (e.g. good samaritan)
McGrath
says
Dawkins
unfairly focuses on extremists and fundamentalists – but most Christians are not prejudiced or violent
We could add: look at all the good charity work that religion inspires. It is a statistical fact that religious people give more to charity than non-religious people
Dawkins on education and schools
The issue of education and faith schools is part of the debate about whether religion is harmful/irrational/intolerant. If so, faith schools would be a problem
(because we wouldn’t want to raise kids to be irrational and prejudiced)
One of the criticisms of faith schools
Dawkins
makes is that they do not teach science properly – when the science goes against religion – e.g. evolution
Dawkins
visited an Islamic faith school and was told that evolution was taught as education law requires, but that most students rejected it. One student challenged
Dawkins
, asking “If people came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?” Before giving the answer,
Dawkins
decided to ask the biology teacher at the faith school what her answer to the challenge was. She was unable to answer, proving
Dawkins’
point that faith schools are unable to give children a proper unbiased education in science
Dawkins
argued that in schools religion should be taught in a
“comparative way according to a national curriculum, not indoctrination”
In the UK, Faith schools are allowed to teach religious education however they want, they don’t have to follow the national curriculum
Dawkins
thought this resulted in a ‘wicked’ practice of schools forcing religious belief on their pupils
Dawkins
argued that bringing a child up in a certain religion was
child abuse
because of the way it prevented their development of critical thinking
Dawkins
also thought it was child abuse to terrify children with the threat of hell if they misbehave or don’t believe
Evaluation
McGrath
responds by first agreeing with
Dawkins
about the problem of parents indoctrinating their children – this fits with his other agreement that religious belief, like all belief, should be subject to evidence-based reasoning and that blind faith is not truly Christian
McGrath
claims
Dawkins
makes a reasonable point, but argues
Dawkins
goes too far when he argues that raising a child religious is ‘child abuse’ and that we need to break the cycle of raising children religious in order to end religion itself, as if religion is only kept going due to indoctrination, not evidence or argument