Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Social media - Coggle Diagram

- - - - Facebook is a superficial environment
        
        Facebook is a valid and valuable social environment
        
        Facebook as a surveillance environment
        
        Facebook as a destructive environment
        
        Sometimes even if people have a negative experience, they still continue use.
        
        Suggests that there is more to use than uses and gratifications.
  - - - People with low self esteem prefer FB interactions than ftf (Forest and Wood, 2012)
        
        their content is rated as less positively and more negatively when compared to people with higher self esteem.
        
        Bowden-green et al, 2021 looked at neuroticism
        
        N is associated with social behaviour like unintended behavioural residue (self information leaks out in unintended ways). Also associated with media content creation.
        
        High Ners don't compensate online by building up large online networks. They often create fake online selves.
        
        Meta analysis of social media use and narcissism. small correlation between grandiose narcissism and time spent, status update and the number of selfies uploaded. No effect with vulnerable narcissism.
        
        Mccain and Campbell (2018)
        
        The same people in 2020 looked at E
        
        Regularly post new content, linked to tweet frequency, status updates and images posted
        
        Offline behaviour links into online more consistently
- - - - Smock et al, 2011
      - Applies to other platforms
    - - Displacement effect? Time on a screen happens intead of something beneficial but we can be active and use screens at the same time.
        
        Good for sleep but other needs could be met
      - Might be better to differentiate between screen time and screen use (Kaye, 2021)
    - - Interactive and reactive use might be better terms to use (Meier and Reinecke, 2020)
  - - - People might think that one does not impact the other
      - The relationship is often bidirectional in nature. Kaye (2021) offline behaviour can be engaged in so that we can portray an online self.
        
        We often shift from user to technology centred approaches
        
        We could use the what, how and why framework
        
        there are different categories of use and different motivations associated with each of them.
        
        consider the ethics of getting accurate user data
- - - - dissociative imagnation (toxic)
        
        Social facilitation (cancelling people)
- - - - People compare abilities and opinions
      - The motivations were later expanded with self improvement and enhancement being some other ones (Wood and Taylor, 1991)
        
        When a person looks at a high achieving CV then their self views were impacted (Haferkamp and Kramer, 2011)
      - Influenced by several things
        
        Opinions versus abilities (What can I do?, What should I think?) Gibbons and Buunk, 1999
        
        Seen on social media- Negative impact is bigger when we compare our ability than for social comparisons of opinions
        
        Ozimek et al, 2023