Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Final Exam - Coggle Diagram

- - - - In short, while the prisoners could cooperate with one another (not testify against one another), with their self interest in mind it is better in their head to defect (testify) if they don't think the other will since they are looking at their best interest (being let free)
  - - - Constant interactions between states in the international system helps them to form a symbatic relationship causing cooperation with those states to be more in their self interest
      - IGOs play a large role between the states so that they can keep their mutual relationship and establish a good relationship for in the future
      - Behavioral standard is created as a shining beacon for all other nation states to follow
  - - - Democracies generally have a mutual expectation of nonviolence and compromise which works well for cooperation
- - - - Stated with Merchant Law where medieval merchants could settle their disputes even when they came from and traveled all over Pro: (didn't require them to stay in once play, go back how or to the court)
      - Pro: Many treaties (especially those between western states) developed which allowed nation-states to arbitrate their differences instead of war
      - Eventually the 1899 Hague Convention for disputes and the Permanent Court of Arbitration was developed and still used today
  - - - It is preferred because it usually has less delays, preferred by both sides are willing to talk out their problems and cooperate to come up with a solution
      - If the case settled in arbitration is does not generate as much publicity (its more private) as it would if it was filed through the ICJ or the ICC
    - - Maybe one side might want the case to be public to make the VIP kick in; perceived self-interest is specifically powerful and informal sanctions from other countries can hurt their soft power
      - Can be useful when one country does not want to cooperate
      - Non-commercial disputes can be tried better in this way
- - - - Usually its IGOs and NGOs that find and alter to a human rights violation, nation states are more likely to point out other human rights violations and ignore their own
      - The UN and its appropriate branches are the ones that are responsible for "stopping" and internationally calling out abuses
      - Also the international community usually calls on the offending country trying to use VIP to their advantage
    - - Over the development of the international community many soft methods that have been used are econ. sanctions, diplomatic talks, and military or econ. aid with human rights incentive
    - - Sometimes the UN is complicit or feeds into human rights violations even ones that they were sent to stop
      - Stopping everything at once while trying to do it peacefully but also possibly commit acts of violence is very complicated to nagivate
      - Local governments can withdraw permission for them to be there that too can create situations of hostility