Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Given the financial cost, should the Olympic Games be moved to a permanent…
Given the financial cost, should the Olympic Games be moved to a permanent venue?NO
The Olympics being hosted in different parts of the world allows different people from across the world to experience the Olympics without travelling.
The Olympics cost countries money to host meaning if the same country hosted forever they could end up in debt.
HOOK
The Olympics aren't only about sports, but brings everyone from around the world together.
-
Have you ever asked yourself the question " When will I get to witness the Olympics in my own country."
-
-
According to a global poll, a majority of people in 18 out of 21 countries stated their nation's performance at the Olympics was important to their national identity.
-
-
-
Argument 3:The permanent hosts would end up in serious amounts of debt, potentially jeopardising their own country.
-
No government has ever made profit from the Olympics except for LA, 84.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-