Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Should we use animals for scientific testing? (No they should not) -…
Should we use animals for scientific testing? (No they should not)
Hook
"It takes nothing away from a human to be kind to an animal." -Joaquin Phoenix
Did you know that pikas were first discovered in 1983? That was only 41 years ago!
History and Background
In the eighteenth to nineteenth century, people started adapting animals as pets.
Pikas are very close relatives to rabbits.
About 115 million animals are taken and brought into labratories
Using animals in research for science can date back to the year of 500 B.C.
Nasa first started sending animals to space in the year of 1947, one of the animals include Laika, the space dog.
Specialized Info
A significant amount of mice, fish, rats, birds, and rabbits, are being burned, poisoned, and abused yearly.
About 50-99.7% of the use of animal testing, fail to meet real human predictions.
About 97% of the animals taken in for testing, die while being experimented on.
Thesis
Animals should not be used in scientific testing because it's morally wrong, inhumane, and there are many other ways to test items, not including animals
Argument #1: Animal testing is morally wrong
Animals can become deaf, blind, and contaminate deadly diseases
Most animals, most likely die in the end instead of living.
Scientists freely kill animals with no remorse
Argument #2:Animal testing is inhumane
Makeup products that use animal testing will most likely not be remembered in the near by future
The products that sacrificed animals, we most likely use without thinking about it
Sunscreen
Anti dandruff shampoo
Toothpaste
They're forced to inhale and consume many toxic items, just for the sake of us getting one or two products in the end
Argument #3: There are other ways to test products, without harming animals
Test products on people who donate their body to science
Testing cells in test tubes are an option
Using organisms, such as bacteria