Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
DURESS - Coggle Diagram
DURESS
A person is forced to commit a crime because they were under threat of death or personal injury by another.
Do this or else’ situation and can be brought about by direct threat or circumstances. Applies to situations concerning gangs or other organised crime agencies.
-
DPP V Lynch--> defendant was ordered by Meehan, a member of the IRA, to drive a car. Lynch did not know him personally but knew by his reputation he would be shot if he did not comply. Three armed men got into the car and Lynch drove them to where he was instructed. The three men then shot and killed a policeman.
Available for all crimes apart from murder, attempted murder and treason R v Gotts (1992)--> 16 year-old was ordered by Dad to kill his Mum. He stabbed her but she survived. Tried to use duress but found guilty of attempted murder.
Circumstances are such that death or personal injury will ensue unless a crime is committed. Usually related to cases associated with road traffic offences, when someone is forced to drive illegally due to circumstances.
Tests are same as duress by threats
DURESS TESTS
Are the threats sufficiently serious? Exposing someone's sexuality was not enough of a threat. R V Valderarmma-Vega
Are the threats unavoidable? Although the threat was not immediate, it was ‘hanging over them’ and could have been carried out following their offence. R V Hudson & Taylor
-
-
R V Willer (1986)-->The appellant had been convicted of reckless driving. As he drove up a narrow road he was confronted with a gang of shouting and brawling youths. He heard one of them shouting, "I'll kill you Willer" and another threatening to kill his passenger. He stopped and tried to turn the car around. The youths surrounded him. They banged on the car. The appellant mounted the pavement in order to escape.
R v Pommell (1995) - The court ruled that the defence was available to all offences except murder, manslaughter and treason.
Too narrow
There is a criticism that in the case of R v Hasan (2005) put too many restrictions on the defence because it was being relied upon by members of gangs and those who were involved in criminal activity by choice.
The objective element of the defence is unnecessary since it punishes anyone who is associated with a criminal.
the female victim of domestic violence who had been bullied into committing a crime may be denied the defence,
Use for murder
Duress is not permitted for the offence of murder, and this is seen as harsh particularly in the light of the terrorist climate
-
-
-