Ethnicity - Institutional Racism

Troyna & Williams

Marketisation & Segregation

Ethnocentric curriculum

EVALUATION

to explain ethnic differences in achievement, we need to go beyond simply examining individual teacher racism

must look at how schools + colleges routinely + unconsciously discriminate against ethnic minorities

Individual racism

results from prejudiced views of individual teachers + others

Institutional racism

discrimination that's built into way institutions

Gillborn

marketisation gives schools more scope to select pupils

allows negative stereotypes to influence decisions about admissions

parents + students can use Ofsted ratings + league tables to decide what schools to go to so schools with best results often oversubscribed

if school has more demand, they can be more selective with intake

The Commission for Racial Equality (1993)

racism in school admissions procedures means ethnic minority children more likely to end up in unpopular schools because:

reports from primary schools that stereotype minority pupils

racist bias in interviews for school places

lack of info + application forms in minority languages

ethnic minority parents often unaware of how waiting list system works + importance of deadlines

curriculum that reflects culture of one ethnic group, usually dominant culture

prime example of institutional racism as it builds racial bias into everyday working of education

Ball

criticises national curriculum for ignoring ethnic diversity + promoting 'little Englandism'

Assessments

Gillborn

assessment game rigged to validate dominant cultures superiority

assessment rules will be changed to re-engineer failure for ethnic minority groups

in the past primary schools used 'baseline assessments' which tested pupils when they started schooling but this was replaced by the foundation stage profile (FSP) so black pupils now appear to be doing worse than white pupils

FSP = increased risk of teacher stereotyping affecting results

FSP based on teachers judgements

change in timing means FSP completed at end of reception year so teachers have had time to get to know + stereotype pupils

Access to Opportunities

Gifted + Talented programme

aimed to meet needs of more able pupils in inner city schools

Gillborn

official statistics show whites over twice as likely as Black Caribbeans to be identified as gifted + talented + five times more likely than Black Africans

black pupils more likely than white pupils to be entered for lower tier GCSEs (often because placed in lower sets) so could only obtain a C at best

New IQism

access to opportunities depends heavily on teachers assessments of pupils ability

disproportionate number of black students in lower sets

students placed in lower sets not only based on prior attainment but also disciplinary concerns + teachers perceptions of attitude

Gillborn

teachers + policymakers make false assumptions about the nature of pupils ability + potential

no genuine measure of actual potential as old style IQ tests don't measure future potential, only current ability + what's been learnt

potential seen as fixed quality that can be easily measured

education system creates environment where ethnic minority pupils routinely disadvantaged

Critical Race Theory

racism = ingrained feature of society

intentional actions of others + institutional racism

Locked-in inequality

Roithmayr

institutional racism = locked-in inequality

Gillborn

ethnic inequality so deep rooted + so large it's practically an inevitable feature of education system

scale of discrimination so large that there no longer needs to be any conscious intent to discriminate as inequality becomes self perpetuating

:( critical race theories argue institutional racism main cause of underachievement + argue internal factors such as assessment + setting systematically produce ethnic minority underachievement

Sewell rejects this view as he argues, although racism hasn't disappeared, alone it's not powerful enough to prevent individuals from succeeding so we should focus on external factors as explanations for underachievement

:( critics point out that there's overachievement of model minorities asking if these minorities can do well, how can the education system be institutionally racist?

Gillborn responds, arguing image of Indians + Chinese pupils as hardworking model minorities performs ideological function that conceals the institutional racism, making system appear fair + meritocratic