Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Education Sociologists: - Coggle Diagram
Education Sociologists:
Booklet 1:
-
New Right
Chubb and Moe: Voucher system, parentocracy, marketisation, privatisation
Marxism
-
Bourdieu: Cultural Capital, Habitus
-
Illich and Freire: deschooling, repression
Booklet 2:
labelling theory
-
-
-
-
Heston, Hargreaves and Meller: speculation, elaboration, stabilisation
-
Student Responses:
-
Lacey: students are differentiated by exam success and polarised by those who conform and achieve highly and those who do not
-
Booklet 3:
Social Class
Material Deprivation
-
-
-
-
Waldfogel and Washbrook: children from low income families more likely to live in poor quality housing
Gibson and Asthana- highlight correlation between low household income and poor education performance
Cultural Deprivation:
-
-
Bernstein: wc can only speak restricted code, mc can switch between restricted and elaborated codes
-
-
Gender
Reasons girls do better
-
McRobbie: job market has changed and it expects women to get qualifications and seek employment. Also speaks of Bedroom culture
-
Mitsos and Browne- argue that girls tend to spend more time completing coursework and take greater care of schoolwork outside of the classroom.
Reasons boys do worse
-
Oakhill and Petridges: boys need to be interested in the content of reading, girls can read and understanding content despite being uninterested
Mac and Ghaill- lack of traditional wc jobs has led to a crisis of masculinity which has led to defeatism in young men
-
ethnicity:
External Factors:
Material Factors:
Gilborn and Mirza- class factors does not override ethnic inequalities- there are differences in achievements between those of the same class but different ethnicity
HoC education select Committee- white British students from most deprived groups have lowest levels of achievement
Palmer- nearly half of all ethnic minority children live in low income families compared with a quarter of white people
-
Cultural factors
Madood- parental encouragement is an important reason why EM are more likely to enter HE than whites
Bhatti: Bangladeshi, pakistani/indian asian families very supportive of Childs education- however parents lacked confidence
Vincent et al- black MC parents particularly concerned with Childs education (however they are treated as though they know less than white MC parents)
Lupton- lower WC white British families from the most disadvantaged areas had indifferent or negative attitudes towards learning, and low aspirations for children
Swann Report and Pilkington- those from EM backgrounds enjoy greater parental support than others- asian families characterised as close-knit extended families with high aspirations
Internal factors:
Racism amongst pupils
Cline et al: racism common in schools- significant proportion of EM students reported race related name calling (can lead to distressing experience of schooling
Educational Triage
Gilbert and Youdell- reinforces failure of black students as they are allocated lower sets and their needs are rejected
Ethnocentric Curriculum
Troyna and Williams- multiculturalism used to make education system more palatable to EM who experience a culture clash (3 S's to overcome 3 R's)
-
Labelling:
-
Wright: media demonisation of young black males leads to perception of school as a racist institution
Bhatti: bangladeshi, pakistani, and indian students ignored in the classroom
Strand- teachers judgement of pupils academic potential distorted by perceptions of behaviour- led to more black students being placed in lower ability groups earlier on in school due to negative labelling
Swann Report- only a small minority of teachers are consciously racist- instead it is unintentional racism which affects students behaviour. Some teachers with racist attitudes gave more attention to white pupils than to black Caribbean students
-
-