U2 AC 2.2

Eysenck's personality theory

Learning theories

Sutherland: Differential Association theory

Criminality is the result of imitation and learned attitudes in groups that favour law-making

Group attitudes in the workplace often normalised behaviour. Members able to justify their crimes - everyone else is doing it.

Evaluation

Weaknesses

Strengths

Crime often runs in families

Matthews: Juvenile delinquents are more likely to have friends who commit anti-social acts - they learn from peer groups

Not everyone exposed to criminal influences becomes criminal

Skinner: Operant Learning Theory

If a behaviour results in a reward it will be repeated. If it results in an undesirable outcome it will not

Jeffery's differential reinforcement theory (DRT) suggests that crime must therefore have more rewards for criminals than punishments

Evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Theories ignore mental processes such as thinking, attitudes and values

Ignores free will of humans - Deterministic

If a behaviour results in a reward it will be repeated. If it results in an undesirable outcome it will not

Jeffery: DRT suggests that crime must therefore have more rewards for criminals than punishments

Bandura's social learning theory

Much of our behaviour is learned from imitating others (models)

We are more likely to imitate people of higher status than us, and if we see them being rewarded

Bobo doll study Children most likely to imitate violent adult model when they saw them rewarded

Evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Takes account of our social nature - we learn from others' experiences

Bandura's study shows importance of role models in learning deviance

Based on lab studies so lacks validity

Not all observed behaviour is easily imitated - we may see criminals rewarded but lack the skills to copy

Ignores free will of humans - Deterministic

Psychodynamic theories

Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory

Evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Shows the importance of parent-child relationships in criminality

Backed up with evidence from the 44 thieves study

Doesn't explain why 61% were not delinquent

Sammons and Putwain: Maternal deprivation not linked to criminality

Retrospective studies rely on memory

If attachment is broken, even for a short time, it can lead to affectionless psychopathy and criminal behaviour

There is a link between maternal deprivation and deviant or anti-social behaviour

A child needs a close, continuous relationship with a primary carer from birth to 5 to develop normally

Study of 44 juvenile thieves referred to child guidance clinic. 39% suffered maternal deprivation before the age of 5 compared with 5% of control group of non-delinquents

Freud: Psychoanalysis

Evaluation

Weaknesses

Strengths

Unscientific and subjective - relies on accepting claims of a psychoanalyst about he unconscious mind of someone else

Critics doubt the existence of the unconscious mind

Points of importance of socialisation and early family relationships in understanding criminal behaviour

Some influence on policies for dealing with crime and deviance

3 conflicting elements of unconscious mind - id, ego and superego

Anti-social behaviour caused by abnormal relationship with parents. Conflicts between id, ego and superego are unresolved which leads to a weak, over-harsh or deviant superego

Our early childhood experiences determine our personality and future behaviour including criminality

Cognitive theories

Yochelson and Samenow: Criminal personality theory

Criminals are prone to faulty thinking and this makes them more likely to commit crime

240 male offenders, most of whom had been committed to a psychiatric unit

Criminals show a range of biases and errors in their thinking and decision-making which may lead to crime. E.g. lying, secretiveness, the need for power and control etc

Evaluation

Stengths

Weaknesses

This has led to other research. E.g. PICTS

Successful treatments. E.g. CBT have been developed from these ideas

Yochelson and Samehow didn't use a control group of non-criminals to compare thinking errors with

Their sample was unrepresentative- only males, and mostly in psychiatric hospitals. Can't account for all criminals

High sample attrition rate - only 30 left in study by the end

Kohlberg's moral development theory

Our ideas of right and wrong develop through a series of levels and stages from childhood to adulthood

Criminals are stuck at a less mature level of moral development and likely to think only of reward and not punishment, not about how their actions will affect others

Cognitive theories have led to the development of CBT as a possible treatment for criminal behaviour

Evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Focuses on moral thinking rather than moral behaviour. Someone may be perfectly capable of thinking morally, while acting immorally

Some studies support delinquents having less mature stage of moral development

Found the theory to be truer for planned crimes such as theft and robbery than impulsive crimes like violence

General criticisms

Artificiality Behaviour in lab experiments is often not the same as in real-life situations

Sample bias Studies are often only on convicted criminals who may differ from those who don't get caught

Neglect of social factors They ignore social factors which may cause criminality. E.g poverty and discrimination

Criminality is the result of a highly neurotic and highly extroverted personality type

Personality dimensions Extroversion vs introversion (E), Neuroticism vs emotional stability (N), and later added psychoticism (P)

Extroverts Have a nervous system with a high need for stimulation so constantly seek excitement through rule-breaking and impulsive behaviour

Neurotics Are harder to condition into following society's rules because high anxiety levels prevent them from learning from punishment

Psychotics People with high P score tend to be solitary misfits who are more likely to be criminal and may have serious mental illness. E.g schizophrenia

Evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Describes how some measurable tendencies may lead to criminality

Studies suggest that offenders to tend towards high E, P and N scores

Farrington Studies show that prisoners are not often extroverted

E measures two separate things - impulsiveness and sociability. These things don't always correspond

Personality type and criminality are correlated, but this doesn't prove personality types cause criminality

Convicted offenders may not be typical of offenders on the whole

Eysenck used self-report questionnaires - people may lie making results invalid