U2 AC 2.2
Eysenck's personality theory
Learning theories
Sutherland: Differential Association theory
Criminality is the result of imitation and learned attitudes in groups that favour law-making
Group attitudes in the workplace often normalised behaviour. Members able to justify their crimes - everyone else is doing it.
Evaluation
Weaknesses
Strengths
Crime often runs in families
Matthews: Juvenile delinquents are more likely to have friends who commit anti-social acts - they learn from peer groups
Not everyone exposed to criminal influences becomes criminal
Skinner: Operant Learning Theory
If a behaviour results in a reward it will be repeated. If it results in an undesirable outcome it will not
Jeffery's differential reinforcement theory (DRT) suggests that crime must therefore have more rewards for criminals than punishments
Evaluation
Strengths
Weaknesses
Theories ignore mental processes such as thinking, attitudes and values
Ignores free will of humans - Deterministic
If a behaviour results in a reward it will be repeated. If it results in an undesirable outcome it will not
Jeffery: DRT suggests that crime must therefore have more rewards for criminals than punishments
Bandura's social learning theory
Much of our behaviour is learned from imitating others (models)
We are more likely to imitate people of higher status than us, and if we see them being rewarded
Bobo doll study Children most likely to imitate violent adult model when they saw them rewarded
Evaluation
Strengths
Weaknesses
Takes account of our social nature - we learn from others' experiences
Bandura's study shows importance of role models in learning deviance
Based on lab studies so lacks validity
Not all observed behaviour is easily imitated - we may see criminals rewarded but lack the skills to copy
Ignores free will of humans - Deterministic
Psychodynamic theories
Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory
Evaluation
Strengths
Weaknesses
Shows the importance of parent-child relationships in criminality
Backed up with evidence from the 44 thieves study
Doesn't explain why 61% were not delinquent
Sammons and Putwain: Maternal deprivation not linked to criminality
Retrospective studies rely on memory
If attachment is broken, even for a short time, it can lead to affectionless psychopathy and criminal behaviour
There is a link between maternal deprivation and deviant or anti-social behaviour
A child needs a close, continuous relationship with a primary carer from birth to 5 to develop normally
Study of 44 juvenile thieves referred to child guidance clinic. 39% suffered maternal deprivation before the age of 5 compared with 5% of control group of non-delinquents
Freud: Psychoanalysis
Evaluation
Weaknesses
Strengths
Unscientific and subjective - relies on accepting claims of a psychoanalyst about he unconscious mind of someone else
Critics doubt the existence of the unconscious mind
Points of importance of socialisation and early family relationships in understanding criminal behaviour
Some influence on policies for dealing with crime and deviance
3 conflicting elements of unconscious mind - id, ego and superego
Anti-social behaviour caused by abnormal relationship with parents. Conflicts between id, ego and superego are unresolved which leads to a weak, over-harsh or deviant superego
Our early childhood experiences determine our personality and future behaviour including criminality
Cognitive theories
Yochelson and Samenow: Criminal personality theory
Criminals are prone to faulty thinking and this makes them more likely to commit crime
240 male offenders, most of whom had been committed to a psychiatric unit
Criminals show a range of biases and errors in their thinking and decision-making which may lead to crime. E.g. lying, secretiveness, the need for power and control etc
Evaluation
Stengths
Weaknesses
This has led to other research. E.g. PICTS
Successful treatments. E.g. CBT have been developed from these ideas
Yochelson and Samehow didn't use a control group of non-criminals to compare thinking errors with
Their sample was unrepresentative- only males, and mostly in psychiatric hospitals. Can't account for all criminals
High sample attrition rate - only 30 left in study by the end
Kohlberg's moral development theory
Our ideas of right and wrong develop through a series of levels and stages from childhood to adulthood
Criminals are stuck at a less mature level of moral development and likely to think only of reward and not punishment, not about how their actions will affect others
Cognitive theories have led to the development of CBT as a possible treatment for criminal behaviour
Evaluation
Strengths
Weaknesses
Focuses on moral thinking rather than moral behaviour. Someone may be perfectly capable of thinking morally, while acting immorally
Some studies support delinquents having less mature stage of moral development
Found the theory to be truer for planned crimes such as theft and robbery than impulsive crimes like violence
General criticisms
Artificiality Behaviour in lab experiments is often not the same as in real-life situations
Sample bias Studies are often only on convicted criminals who may differ from those who don't get caught
Neglect of social factors They ignore social factors which may cause criminality. E.g poverty and discrimination
Criminality is the result of a highly neurotic and highly extroverted personality type
Personality dimensions Extroversion vs introversion (E), Neuroticism vs emotional stability (N), and later added psychoticism (P)
Extroverts Have a nervous system with a high need for stimulation so constantly seek excitement through rule-breaking and impulsive behaviour
Neurotics Are harder to condition into following society's rules because high anxiety levels prevent them from learning from punishment
Psychotics People with high P score tend to be solitary misfits who are more likely to be criminal and may have serious mental illness. E.g schizophrenia
Evaluation
Strengths
Weaknesses
Describes how some measurable tendencies may lead to criminality
Studies suggest that offenders to tend towards high E, P and N scores
Farrington Studies show that prisoners are not often extroverted
E measures two separate things - impulsiveness and sociability. These things don't always correspond
Personality type and criminality are correlated, but this doesn't prove personality types cause criminality
Convicted offenders may not be typical of offenders on the whole
Eysenck used self-report questionnaires - people may lie making results invalid