Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
INDIVIDUAL ORAL ASSESMENT - Coggle Diagram
INDIVIDUAL ORAL ASSESMENT
PARTS
Supervised preparation time
The teacher show two extract about 300 words from one of thow literary works studied
The student chooses one of the extracts and prepares a presentation
Its about 20 minutes
Presentation
The student present the extract, relate to the literary work.
The student may discuss the events and ideas
Its about 3-4 minutes
Follow-up-discussion
The teacher engage on the presentation of the student
The teacher expand on observation of the presentation
Its about 4-5 minutes
General Discussion
The teacher and student have a discussion about the topic
In the discussion may use one or more of the five themes
Its about 5-6 minutes
WHAT IS?
Its an extract about approximately 300 words taken from one of the literary works studied in class
The students need to be able to communicate clearly and effectively, unterstand and use the lenguage appropiate, also to express, and analyse de context.
Its divided intro three parts afeter the period por preparations
Criterion C
Interactive skills - communication
The ability of candidated to express ideas
The ablity of the candidated of maintain a conversation
0
1 - 2
3 - 4
5 - 6
Comprehension and interaction are consistently sustained.
Comprehension and interaction are mostly sustained
Comprehension and interaction are limited
The work dont rech a standerd
Criterion A: Language
Command of Spoken Language
Vocabulary: Appropriateness and Variety
Language Accuracy: Contribution to Communication
Pronunciation and Intonation: Effect on Communication
Grammatical Structures: Variability
Marks
0: Below Standard
1-3: Limited Command
4-6: Partially Effective Command
7-9: Effective and Mostly Accurate Command
10-12: Mostly Accurate and Very Effective Command
Criterion B2
Message - Conversation
Is the appropriately of the candidates respond the questions
The depth of the questions
0
1-2
3-4
5-6
The candidate’s responses are consistently relevant to the questions and show some development.
The candidate’s responses are mostly relevant to the questions.
The candidate consistently struggles to address the questions.
Work dont reach the standards
Criterion B1: Message—Literary Extract
Relevance of Ideas to the Literary Extract
Engagement with the Extract in Presentation
Marks
0: Below Standard
1-2: Mostly Irrelevant
3-4: Mostly Relevant
5-6: Consistently Relevant and Convincing
Depth of Engagement: Observations and Opinions