The insanity defense could be improved with medical assistance.

click to edit

Monitoring clinics is crucial in improving the insanity defense.

Jurors need to take into account the history check of medical circumstances of these people.

Even though these different mock jurors reach opposing points, they nonetheless invoke the same construct dimension? For NGRI verdict jurors cite the construct factor "distorted thinking" as for their verdict but guilty-verdict jurors cite the polar opposite construct thinking,

click to edit

The more they learned about low insight as a symptom, the more they held the defendant accountable. Overall, medication noncompliance often corresponded to greater blame.

As the jurors analyzed these people more they thought them to be less insane.

When compared with other forensic release programs reported in the literature, the Northwest Missouri regional so compares favorably, summarized two studies that included meta-analyses reporting rehospitalization rates of 14.5–25.8% and rearrest rates ranging from 3.4% to 7.8% reviewed the literature from the 1970s, showing rehospitalization rates from 18% to 44% over 2.5–7 years, and rearrest rates of 24–61% over the same period (James B. Reynolds)

: With monitoring hospitalization has been going down showing how effective hospitalization has become with monitoring telling us that with implementing this into clinics getting information would be easier and more beneficial as it will help prove the defendant's case and give the judges an easier time judging on how the guilty felt during the crime.

In contrast, jurors in the compliant condition did not ascribe blame to the defendant, stating that“he was doing all that he could to control his illness... and if it didn't work then it wasn't his fault”and that the hospital was at fault for any medication ineffectiveness. (Caroline Titcomb Parrott)

There isn’t enough monitoring on the defendant so the hospital should really be at blame making it difficult for the jurors to make a decision really bringing in opinion. This infers that with more monitoring we could improve the system to make it easier for the jurors to make a more accurate decision on the ruling of insanity as with the excuse of medication they wouldn’t be able to bypass insanity as they were on medication.

Health checks should be improved upon

sanity evaluation reports from community‐based evaluators and reported that a clinical interview was used in 98–100% of cases, a mental status exam was performed in 67–69% of cases, and an arrest report was reviewed in 65–67% of cases; however, prior mental health records were reviewed in only 31–33% of the cases. Regarding the use of psychological testing in criminal forensic evaluations, only 16% of the reports mentioned testing, with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. (Brett O. Gardner)

History checks should be taken into more consideration as seen in most of these cases they aren’t even really looked at so evaluating these history medical records could be more beneficial in coming to more accurate decisions in rulings.

Taken together, prior research suggests that variations in one's meta‐responsibility for mental illness and MSO may influence decision‐making; however, results are mixed and have not included key variables such as deliberation or qualitative exploration to explain findings. Moreover, previous research suggests that meta‐responsibility is consid-ered more strongly in cases involving someone diagnosed with schizophrenia than in depression or a personality dis-order (Caroline Titcomb Parrott)

: Evaluating without a history check and without a history check really affects whether a person would be considered guilty or not so history checks play a big factor in the decision of the insanity defense as seen through the mock jurors.

here should be more training towards police and doctors

Ms. Stringer was experiencing anosognosia, the clinical lack of awareness that she was ill. As a result, when she turned eighteen, Ms. Stringer stopped taking her prescribed medications and stopped going to therapy. 15Ms. Stringer’s parents were worried for their daughter, but there was nothing they could do. The law in most states requires adults to either voluntarily accept treatment or to become a danger to themselves or others before receiving any treatment (GWENDOLYN WEST)

Since the clinic has to take care of these people training on how to take care of someone mentally ill and the urges of mentally ill could be important as they could cause many problems and harm to others.

“it is the duty of an honest investigating officer to subject the accused to a medical examination and place that evidence before the court and if this is not done, it creates a serious infirmity in the prosecution case and the benefit of doubt has to be given to the accused.” (Suresh Bada Math,)

click to edit

Police officers should know how to identify someone that is mentally ill to help the person get the help they need.

a part of the future of insanity defense accuracy depends on clinical improvement.

Psychiatrists may be asked to assist the court in determining whether certain mental disorders affected a person’s ability to form the intent necessary to make that person legally culpable (Suresh Bada Math)

The medical aspect of the insanity defense factors apart in the ruling of insanity so to make sure the ruling is accurate, improving clinics would be a big part to improve the insanity defense as they help contain the information about these defendants.

Following the plea, the defendant and Case Manager complete the intake, which gathers information about the defendant’s medical issues, substance use, mental health, family, education, employment, and convictions (doj.gov)

Having these principles makes it easier to go off what the person grew up like and what could have caused him to be mentally ill or become mentally ill giving a reasonable cause to believe insane or not helping jurors make a more accurate depiction of what happened nor only with opinion.

click to edit