Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in…

- - - - The perception of movement, depth, or optical effects in Op art works relies on the viewer's interaction and visual exploration. This participatory aspect encourages a subjective engagement, but it also allows the viewer to experience the artwork in a more objective and immediate manner, as the visual effects are often experienced universally and consistently.
      - Op art often draws inspiration from mathematical and scientific principles, such as geometry, physics, and color theory. This incorporation of scientific concepts can contribute to a sense of objectivity by grounding the artwork in established and verifiable principles.
    - - Minimalism places a strong emphasis on objectivity. When you stand in front of a Minimalist artworks, you won't find big ideas, complex subjects, or social agendas. Instead, these paintings focus on geometry and color. The focus on form and structure is not driven by the desire to express emotions but to create a visual and intellectual experience.
      - Instead, art should simply exist in three-dimensional space as pure form. He defines his works as the “specific object”, that is neither painting nor sculpture, but actual items. Donald Judd uses simple materials, colors, shapes, and asymmetrical repetitions to suggest a sense of unity, universality, and objectivity, claiming the ontological presence of his “specific objects'' as purely objective.
      - Minimalist artworks often employ geometric shapes and structures that have a universal quality. These forms, such as squares, circles, or rectangles, are often considered to be objective and timeless. By utilizing these universal forms, minimalism aims to establish a sense of objectivity and universality in the artwork, transcending individual subjectivity and cultural contexts.
    - - by de-emphasizing personal expression, conceptual art challenges the notion that subjective experiences and emotions are the sole markers of artistic significance.
      - Conceptual art often disregards traditional aesthetic criteria such as beauty, technical skill, or visual appeal. You can argue that by doing so, conceptual art questions the overemphasis on subjective aesthetic preferences. It shifts the focus towards intellectual concepts, challenging the idea that art must conform to certain subjective notions of beauty or visual pleasure.
      - Some conceptual artists establish objective parameters or rules for creating their artworks. By adhering to these rules, they remove subjective judgments and personal expression from the artistic process. The focus then shifts to the application and execution of these objective parameters. You can argue that within these predefined boundaries, the evaluation of the artwork can be more objective, as it becomes about the artist's adherence to the established rules.
      - Conceptual art often challenges the subjective value associated with traditional artistic materials and the authority of the artist's hand. By deconstructing the importance of materiality and authorship, conceptual art aims to shift the focus towards the ideas and concepts behind the artwork. This emphasis on the conceptual aspect contributes to a more objective understanding of the artwork, as the focus is less on subjective aesthetic judgments and more on intellectual engagement.