Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Medicine History - Coggle Diagram
Medicine History
-
-
-
Change in Public Health
BEFORE
- The government was laissez faire about PH – what impact did this have?
- Many streets were bare earth so they became muddy and filth collected in the mud
- Nineteen streets did not have a sewer and another 10 only had a sewer covering part of the street; the sewers had only recently been finished in an area where 30,540 people lived
- Stagnant water created offensive smells
- In poorer parts of town, human excrement was collected to sell to farmers
- What did people believe caused diseases like cholera in the 1840s?
- People believed that disease was spread by miasma.
- Made it seem that cholera would mainly affected poor people, who lived in very unhygienic conditions
- Cholera spread in dirty conditions
- What were workhouses and how were they paid for?
- Workhouses were places where poor people could go when they were too old or too ill to work and support themselves
- The money for these workhouses came from local taxes, called rates, but many people resented spending too much money on the poor
After
Edwin Chadwick
1848 Public Health Act
- Sanitation Measures: The Act empowered local boards to take measures to improve sanitation, including the removal of nuisances and the regulation of offensive trades.
- Appointment of Health Officers: The Act allowed local boards to appoint health officers responsible for overseeing public health matters and enforcing the provisions of the Act.
- Public Health Committees: Local boards were authorized to establish public health committees to focus on sanitation and related issues.
- Regulation of Buildings: The Act gave local boards the authority to regulate the construction and maintenance of buildings to ensure public health and safety.
- Nuisances and Offenses: The Act addressed nuisances that could pose a threat to public health and outlined penalties for offenses related to sanitation.
Limitations:
- What couldn’t Chadwick prove and why?
- attitudes were slow to change and many people did not like the idea that local taxes should be increased in order to hep the poor- especially when there was no actual proof that disease was linked to hygiene
- What were the key limitations of the 1848 PHA?
-
- the terms of the act were temporary
- The BoH was only set up for 5 years and ended in 1854
- allowed local authorities to improve hygiene but did not force them to do so
- some local authorities took no action
- In what way did Chadwick himself cause problems?
- Chadwick was a difficult person, who was often arrogant and aggressive.
- he found it hard to get his ideas accepted even though over 50,000 people died in the epidemic of 1848-49
Edwin Chadwick, a social reformer and public health advocate, played a significant role in shaping the ideas that led to the 1848 Public Health Act.
Chadwick's influential reports, particularly the "Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population," highlighted the connection between unsanitary living conditions and disease outbreaks.
His work contributed to the growing awareness of the need for legislative action to address public health issues.
While not the sole cause, Chadwick's advocacy and research helped shape the discourse that ultimately influenced the creation of the Act.
John Snow
Before
-
However, he could not prove that this was the case as he only had statistics in which people who drank the water got the disease
After
1854, John Snow set out to investigate the cause of cholera in London
- What did Snow work out about the 1854 cholera epidemic?
- Snow worked out that cholera was spread by polluted water
- What evidence did Snow gather?
- Within an area roughly 200 meters from the Broad Street pump, there had been 500 fatal cases of cholera
- Houses that were nearer to another water pumps only had 10 fatalities. In all of these cases, the families of the deceased confirmed that they got their water from the Broad Street pump.
- Workers in a factory near to the Broad Street pump had been badly affected. Eighteen workers had died
- Residents of a local workhouse, who had their own water supply, had not been badly affected. (5 out of 535)
- Workers at a local brewery, who drank free beer, were not affected. The brewery also had its own water supply
- A woman living in Hampstead, several miles to the north of Soho, had died of cholera. It was discovered that she had once lived on Golden square in Soho, and had a bottle of water sent up from the Broad Street pump every day because she liked the way it tasted
- How did Snow stop the epidemic?
- His theory was confirmed when the handle was removed so that no water could be collected from the pump- and the deaths from cholera stopped
- His work had demonstrated the link between cholera and infected water and this put pressure on the water companies, local authorities and parliament to improve water supples
- However, people still did not know why other diseases spread, because the link between microbes and disease had not yet been understood
Limitations
- Why did Snow’s work not lead to public health reform until 1875?
- This was due to a lack of understanding for the cause of diseases and many scientist still clung to the ‘bad air’ theory.
- It was only until after Pasteur published his germ theory that anyone could begin to understand exactly why the water was causing cholera.
- Even another cholera outbreak in 1865, which killed 14,000 people, did not force the government to act.
- There were two main reasons why a new law was not passed
- Wealthy people did not want to pay taxes to pay the cost for water supplies, sewers, etc. That would benefit people in the poor parts of towns
- People did not want the government interfering in what happened in their own towns
- Finally, in 1875, a Public Health Act was passed making it now compulsory for local councils to improve sewers and drainage, provide fresh water supplies and to appoint medical officers and sanitary inspectors to inspect public health facilities.
Joseph Bazalgette
- Great Stink in 1858 did convince the government that the sewer system in London needed to be improved.
- With this in mind, 3 million pounds was given to the London Metropolitan Board of Works .
- Joseph Bazalgette became the chief engineer.
- His plans were carefully thought out and had two key features
- Large, oval shaped, built out of brick sewers instead of small, narrow, round pipes
- Planned to bring the waste down to the lower stretches of the Thames, where the river was tidal and the sewage would be washed out to the sea.
- The project was extremely expensive and took several years to complete
- 2000km of sewers had been built by 1865
- Four pumping stations built between 1864 and 1875, and two treatment works to deal with sewage that was not sent out to sea.
- By 1875, when the project was finished, 6.5 million pounds had been spent.
- A side effect was the creation of the Embankment along the River Thames in London which was a way of using the earth that had been dug out of the sewers but it also narrowed the Thames and helped to control the flow of the river
Liberal Government
-
-
- What is the link between taxation and Liberal reforms?
- The government and local authorities know that they should ensure basic standards of housing and hygiene however they were not keen to pay for it
- There were many complaints when the Liberal government put up taxes in 1909 to pay for its reforms
Role of Authorities
- Previously, it had been felt that the government should take action in an emergency, such as a cholera epidemic, but should not interfere in people’s daily lives or their businesses. (Laissez-faire)
- Even when a law was passed, people did not always obey it.
- Chadwick and Snow had highlighted the importance of access to clean water and the removal of sewage.
- As a result, in 1866, the Sanitary Act said that all towns had to employ inspectors to check on water supplies and drain.
- Public Health Act 1875 made local authorities responsible for:
- the supply of clean water
- Dealing with sewage in a way that would prevent it polluting the water used for drinking and washing
-
- ensuring that new housing was built to good standards, to avoid problems of damp and overcrowding
- inspecting conditions in lodging houses
- employing Health Inspectors and Sanitary Inspectors to make sure regulations were obeyed
- Creating street lighting to prevent accidents
- Checking the quality of food on sale
- 1855 Nuisance Removal Act
- Made overcrowded housing illegal
- Made unhealthy conditions in factories illegal
- made local authorities responsible for sewers, water and street cleaning
- This Act encouraged the improvement of slum housing or its demolition
- This made sure that the previous Vaccinations Act was obeyed
- 1875 Artisans Dwelling Act
- This made the house owners responsible for keeping their properties in good order and gave local authorities the right to buy and demolish slums if they were not improved
-
Beveridge report
- Identified five key problems:
- Want- the problems of poverty and not having enough money or food
-
- Ignorance- Lack of education, meaning people were unlikely to get better jobs or to develop a better understanding of society
- squalor- living in dirty and unhygienic conditions
- idleness- unemployment, meaning people were ore likely to become depress and possible turn to alcoholism or crime
- He felt that the state had a duty to help and protect the people as well as believed the people had a responsibility to do what they could to improve things for themselves
- The Beveridge Report was a best-seller
- Surveys of public opinion found that 95 percent of the population had heard of it and there was huge support for its proposals.
- Many people felt that the Beveridge Report would provide a much brighter future for society in Britain
- At the end of the war, in 1945, a Labour government was elected.
- The new prime minister, Clement Attlee, announced that a welfare state would be set up to protect the people from ‘from the cradle to the grave’.
- This meant that everyone could have an acceptable standard of living.
- The welfare system would be paid for through National Insurance contributions made by employees and employers
Aneurin Bevan
Background
- Came from poor background in wales
- Left school at the age of 13 to work in the local coal mine
- Knew all the problems of poverty and poor health, and became a trade union activist
- Won a scholarship which paid for him to study in London
- Became a Member of Parliament and continued to work to improve the lives of the poor
Contributions
- When the new Labour government was elected in 1945, Bevan became the Minister for Health, responsible for setting up the NHS
- he faced a great deal of opposition from doctors, who did not like the idea that they would be employed by the NHS, instead of running their own private medical practices.
- Doctors did not receive much money for their hospital work and, as a result, they relied of the fees they got from private patients.
- Many doctors were afraid that they would lose money because they would not be able to set their own fees.
- A survey by the British Medical Association found that over 40,000 medical practitioners disapproved of the NHS Act, while fewer than 5,000 approved of it
- Bevan agreed to pay GPs according to the number of patients they saw.
- he agreed that GPs could continue to run their own private practices, as well as working for the NHS
- A campaign to tell the public about the NHS encouraged people to put pressure on their doctors to join the NHS.
- Consequently, when the NHS came into operation in 1948, 90 percent of the doctors in Britain had enrolled in the new system
Impacts of the NHS
- Life expectancy increased dramatically
-
-
Change in Surgery
Before:
3 main problems:
Pain
- only types of pain relief available were alcohol, a form of opium, or being knocked unconscious.
- In most operations, the patient was awake and often screaming in pain so the surgeon’s assistants, or dressers had to hold to patient down
- The ‘best’ surgeon was not the one who cut most skillfully but the one who cut the quickest
Infection
- However even when patients survived the operation, a high percentage of them died afterwards as a result of infection
- Many operations were carried out in the patient’s home, which was not hygienic- although conditions in hospitals were often far worse
- There was little understanding of how infection happened and the surgeon would wear old clothes that were already stained with blood and pus, rather than spoil decent clothes.
- If patients were lucky, the surgeon might was his hands before the operation.
- Equipment was wiped clean or washed briefly between patients; it was not sterilized.
- The sponge used to wipe away blood was just rinsed out, and bandages were washed then reused.
- There were often lots of people in the operating theatre, as well as the surgeon and his assistants: medical students and wealthy people who supported the hospital with money would watch the operation, making infection even more likely
Blood Loss
-
Attempts to carry out blood transfusions in the past had often caused the death of the patient but no one understood why.
After
Pain
Ether
1846
-
- Experimented on by William Morton, a dentist in the USA in 1846,
- found out it had a stronger effect on the patient
- Used in an operation to amputate a leg later in 1846 by Robert Liston
-
- Caused vomiting and irritated the lungs
-
- leave the patient asleep for either hours or even days
- The gas was also highly flammable which was dangerous when the operation theatre was lit by candles or gas
Chloroform
1847
James Simpson
- Professor of Midwifery at Edinburgh University.
- He had used ether but was searching for a better anesthetic.
- He was experimenting with different chemicals with some colleague one evening when he discovered that sniffing chloroform knocks you unconscious- a general anesthetic
- Discovered chloroform did not seem to have the same side effects as ether
- Used it in 1847 for women in childbirth.
- After royal approval, patients began to ask for chloroform in their operations and it because much more widely used
- Solved the problem of pain in surgery
- However there were problems associated with its use
- The Christian Churched was opposed to the use of chloroform in childbirth due to after Adam and Eve were made to leave Garden of Eden, Eve was told childbirth would be painful
- Many doctors opposed to its use on childbirth as it was not know how chloroform might affect the baby
- It was difficult to get the dose of chloroform right- enough to put the patient to sleep nut not so much that they died
- Some doctors felt that a patient who was unconscious was more likely to die than one who was kept awake by pain
- By using chloroform, many surgeons felt confident enough to attempt longer and more complicated operations, often deeper inside the body
- Chloroform gave surgeons more time to work, however they still did not understand hygiene and infection
- The surgeons bloody hands and unhygienic equipment took germs right into the body
- The bedsheets and the bandages had usually been used before, often still having stains and germs on them, passing infection to the patient
- Many patients would have developed gangrene around the surgery wound.
- This infection often developed into sepsis, until the patient died.
- The increased in length of operations caused more problems such as blood supply being cut off for too long which increased the risk of gangrene
Infection
Joseph Lister
Carbolic Acid 1876
- Lister would first use bandages soaked in Carbolic acid and would see wounds healing without infection
- Lister begun to use carbolic acid to clean wounds, equipment and bandages in all his operations, and the death rate from infection dropped dramatically (this method was called antiseptic)
- in 1864-66(without antiseptics), Joseph Lister had a 45.7% death rate
- in 1876-70(with antiseptics), Joseph Lister had a 15% death rate
- In 1892 Lister and Pasteur were together given an award at the Sorbonne University in Paris for their contribution to the fight against disease. Koch learned from both of them, and also spurred them on to new discoveries
- This improved surgery due to the decrease in deaths caused by infection
Limitations
- Carbolic Acid spray made the surgical instruments slippery and difficult to grip
- Spray made the skin on surgeons’ hands cracked and sore
- Many doctors did not accept Pasteur’s germ theory
- Doctors who tried Lister’s techniques did not use them properly and did not find them effective
- Some doctors used a simple hygiene routine based on soap and water which had very good results. They saw no need for additional antiseptic techniques
- Other surgeons thought he was not confident that his ideas were effective as he often experimented with adjustments to his techniques
- Lister had read Pasteur’s work.
- When he was told that carbolic acid was used at the Carlisle sewage works to treat the sewage, he realised the carbolic acid was killing the microorganisms responsible for the decay and smell
- He also realised that the smell associated with infected wounds was very similar to the smell of sewage
- Which then made him wonder if carbolic acid could be used to prevent infection
Blood Loss
Blood Transfusions
-in 1901, an Austrian doctor called Karl Landsteiner discovered that there were different blood types: A, B, and O;
in 1902, he identified a fourth type, AB. Doctors realised that patients could die if they were given blood of a different type- for example, if a person with type A blood was given type B blood.
Transfusions could now be carried out successfully, as long as the patient was given blood from the right group.
Limitations
The main problem now was that the blood donor had to be present in order for the transfusion to be carried out and it was not always possible to find a donor of the right group.
furthermore, blood starts to clot as soon as it leaves the body so the tubes used in transfusion should also become blocked.
The improvement in scientific knowledge about blood groups was important but progress in surgery could not really happen until scientific knowledge had developed ways to prevent blood clotting and technology had overcome the problems of storing blood and the process of transfusion