Utilitarianism
Mill's rule utilitarianism
Mill believed that life should be about seeking higher pleasures instead of lower pleasures
Mill describes higher pleasures as "intellectual, aesthetic, social enjoyment and spirituality"
Mill describes lower pleasures as actions that provide short term pleasure but have no long lasting benefits
Mill's pig quote says that "it is better to be a human who is dissatisfied than a pig who is satisfied; better to be socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied"
Mill believed that only the wise could distinguish between what actions provided them with the most long term pleasure.
This means that many view Mill as elitist due to his higher pleasures catering only to the rich and powerful and not the poor.
Bentham's Act utilitarianism
Bentham believed that you should do what ever brings you the most joy and pleasure no matter the action
Unlike Mill, Bentham only recognises one type of pleasure
He also believed that we can calculate the amount of pleasure an action would generate using the hedonic calculus
Strengths vs Weaknesses:
Strengths of Rule Utilitarianism
It is in line with human rights
Keeps us safe from exploitation by the powerful
certain to bring around happiness
Weaknesses of Rule Utilitarianism
There is a lack of simplicity as it can be hard to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures sometimes
Only a select few are able to participate in the higher pleasures
Sidgewick said "we cannot distinguish between higher and lower pleasures"
For some lower pleasures might generate more pleasure than higher pleasures
Strengths vs Weaknesses:
Strengths of Act Utilitarianism
Can be seen as compassionate because it focuses on the consequences of an action and therefore focusing on more people than just yourself
It is a very simple and easy to understand theory
It is used in most democratic systems
The theory supports human nature as we all want to be happy
With more societies becoming secular Bentham's theory gains popularity because it doesn't rely on any sort of God
Weaknesses of Act Utilitarianism
It can be too simplistic and not provide a relevant answer in all situations if the only goal is just pleasure
It can lead us to do actions that seem morally questionable like killing someone for their organs as it would save more people
Philip Petite "there is nothing that act utilitarianism wont allow not rape, not torture, not even murder"
Macintyre said that we should "reject the theory as it allows horrendous acts to be permitted just because the majority wants it to happen" Eg: child labour in sweatshops for lower prices
The theory doesn't take into account who the other person is in each situation. For example we are more likely risk our lives for a family member rather than a stranger
What should we do if two acts generate the same amount of happiness
Robert Nozick said that "happiness is not important"
Relativism
Weak Rule vs Strong Rule
Strong Rule says that no matter the situation, you should never break the rules
Weak Rule says that the rules can be broken only in dire situations
Cultural relativism describes differing human behaviours and beliefs among different societies.
Diversity thesis suggests that Moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society so there can be no moral standards held by all societies
Dependancy thesis suggests weather or not it is right for individuals to act in a certain way is relative to the society to which they belong
Ethical relativists believe that there is no universal right or wrong
Principle of utility
The principle of utility is the greatest balance of good over evil
The hedonic calculus is a scale of seven questions used to measure the amount of happiness generated by an action
Intensity
Certainty
Extent
Remoteness
Duration
Purity
Fecundity